Xogen

i must say i have never seen anyone getting the 3 times out than what was put in. yet the guy from dublin claimed he did, i believe it because he recommeded a lot of investment. yet still he acknowledged it fell well short of stans output. 3 times output over input was good enough for investment. you could profit from that alone. god knows why no one is getting near the 3 times output, why dont we see anyone getting his results.? maybe he had somethign closer to the correct design.

in plumbing a "harmful" side effect of closing a tap called water-hammer will destroy the pipes if an air chamber is not installed to cusion the shock. however the same "harmful" effect is harnessed in impulse pumps to lift water higher than the source with just gravity as the input (no elec. pwr) in electronics overcharging a capacitor wlii cause it to blow up (bad) but in this use the dielectric H2o is broken down for a (good) /useful purpose. I really hope this tech spreads like a plague THX

( I figured out how the process is occuring by studying basic electronic circuits online (wikibooks) to find out the functions of the parts in relation to each other.--- an LC or RLC circuit. ) my math skills are limited dyslexic w/ #s but if i can dope out the process and understand it, so too others. the electrolyte style is toxic and not viable in the long term. there are no Phisics laws being broken here. an "unwanted/harmful" electric circuit is used to do valuable work

this IS the technology that will liberate the people of the world. But the battle with Big corporate infrastructure and Govt.dependance on oil taxation revenue will be fierce. It will require the re-structuring of society in many ways, which will be painful at first. But this technology exists today and is in the public domain..... continued..

This particular method isn't electrolysis, what this method is called is the high voltage disassociation of water. It produces HHO at a much higher rate than conventional electrolysis and the amperage is restricted in this process making it extremely efficient. You won't see it being uses because it threatens the current oil, coal, and nuclear based economy. Conventional electrolysis cannot purify water because it requires purified water an a electrolyte additive in order to work.

That process sounds correct, but still hasn't been replicated.
Or do you know of one?

I don't think it is really any different (at least, fundamentally) from ordinary electrolysis. True, they have optimized it for tap water with a well designed circuit (it is true that a higher voltage is required for water of lower conductivity), but keep in mind that hydrogen as well as "HHO" is an infrastructure/ energy storage plan, and not "free energy", as so many hopefull people seem to think :).

Isn't this the "Stanley Meyers" method using what he called "water fracturization"???.

I think it is but the company behind this video seems to be nothing more than a website so who knows? I do know Stanley Meyers brother was suppose to be involved with this company. Obviously since Xogen is doing nothing at this moment, there must not be investors willing to invest or the technology is being suppressed at the corporate level.

I think you are doing a great job. Skeptics can move along and away. I run my current work shop "lights and AC on this concept. We should get together sometime and mix our ideas.