WTC 7 Report - sweet relief!

Fire did it! More computer models. These people want to see if we'll swallow this.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• NIST
• WTC
• 9/11
• world
• trade
• center
• building
• report
• fire
• global
• collapse
• structural
• failure
• DC
• Madam
• suicide
• Bruce
• Ivins

[chicagobuilt]

Probably the greatest video I've ever seen pertaining to the opposition of the official 911 report.

[23456D]

Thanks cb.

[eleutheromaniac]

NIST: Okay, so the White House has told us fire caused the collapse of WTC 7. Now we just have to figure HOW THE FUCK THAT'S EVEN POSSIBLE

3 years later

NIST employees: Okay, after seven kajillion computer simulations, we finally have something--it's like a .000001% chance, but it does show that it is physically possible to cause the collapse with fire. Like 30 different unusual things need to happen, but it is possible.

NIST: Good enough.

employee: Peer review it?

NIST: lolwut?

[Daddyo930]

We could end all the debate if NIST would submit it's report and data of the computer simulation for peer review. That is the obvious key to this mystery. We would then know that the king has no clothes. The cover up was easier to unravel than a fourth rate adventure novel. It is only a matter of time now. I think they will use the Madrid fault line as a "distraction" soon. Nebraska nuclear power plant is underwater now. Danger Will Rodgers!

[AdIgnorantiam]

@fulluvshit Fires? Simple fires brought the WTC down? Not a high velocity impact that severely weakened the steel structures, and then sprayed tons of jet fuel in the vicinity which instantly ignited and fueled an extreme fire that just raised the temperature more over its burn?

And hurricanes and tornadoes are just windstorms, really. And that tsunami in Japan? Just an abnormally high tide.

[iBlindGame]

Thanks for your fine comments. I hope you didn't spend much time reading that report.

Some videos you might appreciate:

bit.ly slash iBlindGame

[fulluvshit]

@AdIgnorantiam millions of steel framed high rise building disasters, mostly fires, and never does ever collapse, let alone exactly like a CD except by CDs. 3 of them happen in the same place on the same day. Even if it werent ridiculously obvious that steel framed structures cant 'drop' at freefall speed as in WTC7, and cant maintain their 'drop' accel as WTCs 1 & 2, its so statistically improbable that only an idiot would take the govts bs explanation. Dude, you can see all the f-ing squibs!

[lee3po]

There are pictures of the damage to building 7. And eyewitness accounts. Both courtesy of firefighters. The reasons there are not many of them and most people haven't seen them are three: a) the portions of the building sustaining the damage were in the bottom 25% of it's total height and were obscured by surrounding buildings, b) a shitstorm of amount of smoke from fires burning unfought for hours c) no one but the firemen could get close enough to see these things.

[EdgemanLL2]

@Fantacyshroom Moron. =]

[Fantacyshroom]

@EdgemanLL2 Drone.

[SexyMelon]

NIST reports in a nutshell: "Look, here's how we think it happened! That means that IS how it happened! Evidence? What evidence? Look at how much detail we put into describing what we think happened!"

How hard can it be to obtain a few fragments of steel from the damaged floors to check if they were subjected to high enough temperatures to collapse anyway? It's not like that steel was destroyed or anyth... Oh right.