Testosterone = violence, according to manipulative feminist theory
Top Comments
All Comments (118)
-
@TwyztdValkyrie it doesnt matter from eac sides perspective, the opposing gender is conidered more psycho, which can be seen as both sides claiming to be the victim and in most cases having good reason to, by personal experience, or by research bias or unbiased, so basically its a game of tennis where both genders are going back and forth between who's more prone to violence
-
Hmmm..I thought both sexes had different degrees of testosterone. Speaking of Violence..in the new millenium..I see crazy, psychotic women hitting men when they have had too much to drink...and I have seen plenty of recent footage of women hitting men in relationships. For the most part its considered cute, non-threatning etc. "Because men can defend themselves" YEAH RIGHT...you go STRAIGHT TO PRISON. Never be on the recieving end of a womans LEGAL WRATH. For them..its a WIN-WIN situation.
-
Superb !
-
Men *should* be tougher and "more violent"; I really don't see why men being more aggressive is a problem. Now... why are we attacking women here on a whole, and talking about replacing us is rather upsetting... Men and women are supposed to work together, and you guys can't HONESTLY think that all women are psycho feminists - as I know that men are not psycho abusers who are also man-boys. If we stopped fighting gender roles and accepted our innate ways, I think we wouldn't have these issues...
-
I see some scientists in Germany have created sperm in a lab recently, anyone want to bet that they're all X's so that "womyn" can finally have kids in their forties without having to find a "real" donor?
-
@GeorgiaBoy1961 Even better!
-
@blueshogun96: Re: ""By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God." - Gloria Steinem
How about we raise to disbelieve and ignore Gloria Steinem!
-
All this talk about manginas??? Everyone, lets not forget that "White Knights" lead and create manginas as well. You need an alpha male of the caliber of Sean Connery/Clint Eastwood to beat them.
-
@manwomanmyth i am certain of this also, if u can get a woman who is a true 10 without having to take her out to dinner ect, u are sure she will be loyal. then well no way id want to find a human wife, give me a robot hehe. however the main thing needed is that we as men can reproduce outside of needing a woman to do so
cause im sure im not alone, ive always known i want kids, the downside is they will need a woman to give birth, i think the steriotype that men dont wanna be fathers is false
There is a strong argument that sexbots and artificial wombs might be the only way to tackle the twin problems of societal misandry and men's competition with each other.
Women are the limiting factor in both reproduction and sex and these are principal human drives. Removing or sidestepping this limit, might put women in the same position as Kodak when digital photography emerged.
Kodak failed to adjust and haven't managed to compete in the new business. Their market value has plummeted.
manwomanmyth 2 months ago 27
@RedLanternXY
it might very well happen, probably within the next 50 years or so, this carries with it a host of new moral and ethical questions, but i also believe that if men are ever given the chance to break the monopoly that women have on breeding, they will certainly take it, as there is immense power to be had in doing so.
barbarossaaaa 2 months ago 13