David Wood vs. Ali Ataie: "Who Was Muhammad?" (PART 2)
Top Comments
All Comments (350)
-
Just prattle and no evidence that Muhammad did even existed!
Ali was trying all the time to make Christians look bad! But the topic was "Who Was Muhammad?"
-
History cannot deny, or duplicate, the return to Mecca without bloodshed. What more evidence of non-violence could possibly be given?
-
400,000 civilian casualties in 4 years Iraq. - See video at 16:45 -
-
Why are christians so full of b.s all the time and so insulting? anyone? i don't believe in GOD, so far i watched Shamoun and David and goodness their mouth is so filthy it puts me off christians but i do like the way the muslims compose themselves in debates very polite, calm and professional :)
-
@chriss179 He did. David is quoting stories written in Tabaris hadiths. But the most historians and islamic scholars do not see Tabaris hadiths authentic. And thats was Ali is trying to say all the time yet David is basing hes arguments on those hadiths.
Tabari himself said in hes books that he just tried to find everything without doing research on it or have other scholars researched it. We muslims researched hes work and most are not authentic so quoting hes hadiths are not right
David's the "christian" smokescreen and lies all rebutted in one sentence, khalas, beautiful. Allah hu akhbar.
navynmr 1 month ago in playlist Christian-Muslim debate (David Wood vs. Ali Ataie: "Who Was 7
I love the Prophet Mohammad--peace and blessings be upon him!
There is no god but The One True God, and the prophet Mohammad is his messenger.
WaterMots 1 month ago 6