Tiktaalik, Your Inner Fish - Part 2

@musicequalstruth
22 gram soul, I don't think anyone would really try to duplicate that test, it was dubious enough to do it in 1911, more so today where you would face harsh ethical and legal consequences.

From what I found out, only 2 out of 6 really had loss a 22 grams post mortem, does that mean the other 4 don't have souls?
Still your a QM, you know that scientist must first exhaust all possibility before finally declaring it as a soul. The 1911 data, he simply jumped to his conclusion

So,my issue with the modern evolutionary theory is that most biological scientists are neglecting to include supernatural events and higher dimensional physical laws into their theories.New research shows that using only a laser,you can completely reprogram DNA,and a completely new species will generate from an existing species in 1 generation(Salamander to frog)That alone proves that a species can turn into another species without the need for a middleman. Tiktaalik was a species,nothing more.

Tiktaalik proves evolution is a fact, not a theory as you claim. " scientists are neglecting to include supernatural events"....such as? sounds like you live in a fantasy reality where facts or evidence are coming straight from your imagination. You have nothing to back up your claims.

i'm not arguing against evolution, it is occurring, I'm arguing that it is occurring due to intention and purpose, with some level of intelligence behind the design of life. I'm not saying God created everything, I'm saying that random mutation didn't create life. There is lots of evidence showing that thought and intention have a powerful effect over reality. This should be included into evolutionary theory. So far it is not. Until you understand modern physics, you'll never understand reality

@musicequalstruth
if the claim that spontaneous DNA formation from sand is true, then the formation of non-life to life is much more common occurrence. Hence the creationist adamantly claim that Abiogenesis is an impossibility. But if that research is true then the creationists are wrong. I don't think that creationist would acknowledge that research.

Bingo, I'm definitely not a creationist, but I can see the design in the machine of life you could say,and I have had some pretty weird events occur in my life that can only be described as spiritual,so I feel compelled to believe in the higher energy realms,which modern physics just so happens to be finding in their math and hopefully soon in physical proof. New science suggests that life might be intrinsic to the universe. That means that intelligent life must be everywhere.Aliens are humanoid

so your an Alien intervention ID, not the creationist ID type.

I haven't seen any UFO's and aliens. Most evidences are allegory at best. The only way that I would be convinced is either I see the aliens myself. But that has never happened.