NDAA Military Detention of US Citizens Breaks Through to Major Media. Not American One, the BBC.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Jan 8, 2012
Breaking the major news media's blackout on the most radical elimination of American rights in U.S. history, Professor of Law Jonathan Turley speaks to BBC on the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA), which allows for the indefinite military detention of US citizens without charge or trial in violation of the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Constitution.
Professor Turley addresses Obama's NDAA "signing statement" which seeks to downplay this broad new claim of authority, and the entire context of government encroachment on American rights since 9/11. He points out Obama's recent claim of presidential authority to order any American citizen assassinated without charge or trial when deemed suspected of terrorism, and the veil of secrecy which surrounds government proceedings for deciding who is and who is not a "terrorist."
For more information on NDAA go to
NDAA Primer, Pertinent Sections with Commentary
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forcesthat are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
COMMENT: "Substantial support" of an "associated force" may imply citizens engaged in innocuous, First Amendment activities. Direct support of such hostilities in aid of enemy forces may be construed as free speech opposition to U.S. government policies, aid to civilians, or acts of civil disobedience. Rep. Tom McClintock opposed the bill on the House floor saying it: "specifically affirms that the President has the authority to deny due process to any American it charges with "substantially supporting al Qaeda, the Taliban or any 'associated forces'" — whatever that means. Would "substantial support" of an "associated force," mean linking a web-site to a web-site that links to a web-site affiliated with al-Qaeda? We don't know."
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111-- 84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person's country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(e) AUTHORITIES.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
COMMENT: "Existing law" is Fourth Circuit in Jose Padilla.
Section 1022 "(b) APPLICABILITY TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS":
(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS.—The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
COMMENT: Even if US citizens are not "required" to be detained by the military in terrorism cases, it is still "allowed."
- 3:26 Rick Santorum Slammed by WeAreChange - Ron Paul and Lt. Colonel Schaffer Assistby wearechangeFeatured 51,859
- 7:42 Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!by coffeefication 1,268,033 views
- 3:26 Ron Paul Write-In Votes will Count in These States: AL, IA, WI, PA, CA, VT, NH, DE, ORby ralphlopez 3,116 views
- 5:10 Anonymous - Message to the American Peopleby We are Legion! 9,625,183 views
- 5:06 Anonymous - NDAA Bill Signedby We are Legion! 187,050 views
- 3:37 Farrakhan on Obama's signing of NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act)by FinalCall.com News Network 84,221 views
- 5:07 AMERICA IS GONE!! Listen to this... It is over! WAKE UP PLEASE!!!.by The Greatest Tactical Channel EVER!!! 1,749,057 views
- 9:52 U.S. Army prepares to invade U.S.by Corbett Report 1,791,607 views
- 28:15 The Final Loss of Freedom in America NDAA.√ (monkart)by DarkMonkArt 24,946 views
- 3:05 A Video Prayer for a Ron Paul Third Party Presidential Run, 2012by ralphlopez 478 views
- 3:46 Romney Bullying Witness Interview Segueing to "The Chocolate War" Trailerby ralphlopez 586 views
- 12:11 Chris Hedges Sues Obama Admin Over Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens Approved in NDAAby democracynow 31,352 views
- 3:05 A Video Prayer for a Ron Paul Third Party Presidential Run, 2012by ralphlopez 321 views
- 10:43 Americans to be Targeted As Terrorists Under NDAA Bill - Infowars Nightly Newsby TheAlexJonesChannel 50,003 views
- 5:57 Calling the White House about the NDAAby TheResistance 10,286 views
- 2:15 Romney admits he would have signed the National Defense Authorization Act if he were presidentby Backup Channel 30,703 views
- 9:54 Obama Signs NDAA Bill : What is the NDAA Billby ExplosiveNews 76,065 views
- 15:13 "President Obama Just Stated That He Can Have ANY American Citizen Killed!" Jonathon Turley pt.1by UNFAIR & BIASED 14,456 views
- 42:29 Constitutional Expert Jonathan Turley on Privacy C-SPANby Dipsodan 1,125 views
- 5:19 INDEFINITE DETENTION OF AMERICANS - New NDAA Bill Passed by Obamaby Fazz Bodyweight Strength & Power 65,935 views
- Loading more suggestions...