My entry into AtheistAussie's Debunkathon (Chemtrails - 5 minute maximum) I am not a scholar - which means anyone has access to this knowledge. I learned much during the research for this video and I hope any "chemtrailers" will follow some of the links below to research this for themselves, and not take my word for it.
I recognize that this does not debunk ALL the theories behind chemtrails - to do that you would need MUCH more than five minutes - and so I focused on a single common claim that since the 1990's contrails have changed in their frequency and persistence.
@JPO1618 I just typed in 'Chemtrails Geoengineering' into Google and hundreds of links came up. You could do the same. You should also look into the German news report about chemtrailing that became big news there.
@Crowesfan09 Did I miss where you gave "university scientific proof" or "independent" proof from a qualified expert? If I did, then I apologize.
What about my argument was nonsense?
I am only close-minded enough for my brain not to fall out on the floor. I am open-minded, but highly skeptical. The History Channel has shows about bigfoot and UFOs too. History would have me believe in Atlantis and The Loch Ness Monster. I think you get my point.
@JPO1618 You fail to mention in your ridiculous debunking video that these chemtrails have been observed in varying climates and altitudes. You truly have no idea about the scientific nature of actual contrails compared to what is being observed over our sky's today.
@JPO1618 Well, you are the one that wanted mainstream proof, because you refused to accept independent and university scientific proof. Now, i give you a mainstream one and you say it again. You truly are the most close minded individual I have ever met. Not to mention that your argument in this video is absolute nonsense.
@Lamvesp Alan Watt's website is a disaster. He claims his "background is that of a renaissance man with a background in three professions" which made me LOL. You can't find anything on his site with no search feature and its miles long pages. He appears to be hawking his books and crap, though I can't see what makes him an authority on anything. Unless I am wrong he appears to be a nutter looking to make a buck from scared people. Where does he talk of chemtrails, I can't/won't find it.
@JPO1618 I just typed in 'Chemtrails Geoengineering' into Google and hundreds of links came up. You could do the same. You should also look into the German news report about chemtrailing that became big news there.
Lamvesp 4 days ago
@Lamvesp Shouldn't they be accessible somehow on this information superhighway? I'm not asking him anything.
JPO1618 4 days ago
@Crowesfan09 Did I miss where you gave "university scientific proof" or "independent" proof from a qualified expert? If I did, then I apologize.
What about my argument was nonsense?
I am only close-minded enough for my brain not to fall out on the floor. I am open-minded, but highly skeptical. The History Channel has shows about bigfoot and UFOs too. History would have me believe in Atlantis and The Loch Ness Monster. I think you get my point.
JPO1618 4 days ago
@JPO1618 You fail to mention in your ridiculous debunking video that these chemtrails have been observed in varying climates and altitudes. You truly have no idea about the scientific nature of actual contrails compared to what is being observed over our sky's today.
Crowesfan09 5 days ago
@JPO1618 Well, you are the one that wanted mainstream proof, because you refused to accept independent and university scientific proof. Now, i give you a mainstream one and you say it again. You truly are the most close minded individual I have ever met. Not to mention that your argument in this video is absolute nonsense.
Crowesfan09 5 days ago
@JPO1618 Ask him to send you the documents that he's had sent to him.
Lamvesp 5 days ago
@Lamvesp Alan Watt's website is a disaster. He claims his "background is that of a renaissance man with a background in three professions" which made me LOL. You can't find anything on his site with no search feature and its miles long pages. He appears to be hawking his books and crap, though I can't see what makes him an authority on anything. Unless I am wrong he appears to be a nutter looking to make a buck from scared people. Where does he talk of chemtrails, I can't/won't find it.
JPO1618 5 days ago
@Crowesfan09 And we all know how reliable the history channel can be...[*sarcasm*]
JPO1618 5 days ago
History Channel Documentary Validates Chemtrails and Weather Warfare-Airs July25 4pm
Crowesfan09 5 days ago