The Magnetic Atom - Electrons Revealed

**Disclaimer** This video was made after doing research into the works of Jon Depew and Ed Leedskalnin and for that I am very grateful.
---
Everything in the universe is connected, magnetically. This is old news, but why didn't anyone stop and ask how? This video explains how everything in the universe is connected and it describes an atom that makes a LOT more sense than the current orthodox model.

I am sure there are a lot of problems to be worked out but the fall out discoveries from this have already been huge:

1. Black Holes - Solved and no need for a singularity
2. Dark Energy - Magnetic Current is Dark Energy, and we can use it
3. Dark Matter - The matter that falls through the lattice work
4. This is the secret to room temp super conductors - and how they built the Pyramids with stone tools.

And much much more. This discovery could propel us into a new golden age if mainstream science would give it a chance and start using it.. Knowing the history of science, it probably won't happen until after I am dead...but I plan on spending my free time doing my best to get the word out to the public as best as I can. Thanks for watching.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ed Leedskalnin Jon Depew
• physics
• atom
• pyramids
• coral castle
• maya
• 2012
• free energy
• ancient technology
• magnets
• magnetic current
• power
• global
• solar
• green

[vizierfennin]

Where is the MECHANISM for all of these unique powers the electron has? Why should an electron be able to absorb a photon when its exists as a "probability". Can a probability even be said to be objectively real?

Its all well and good to just say the electron has all these powers but like all of quantum physics there is no mechanism is ever provided.

[markstringf]

Furthermore, two electrons needn't have the same energy by virtue of them being "identical". A motionless electron has far less energy than one moving at great speeds just like a motionless ball has less energy than an otherwise identical moving ball.

[vizierfennin]

@markstringf Granted I was exaggerating a bit to illustrate the point that there are a LOT of problems with the electron as we have observed it. Lets list a few:

1. It can interfere with itself (2 slit experiment)

2. It needs a "pocket" that can store a photon and release

3. IT turns into a "cloud" or probability as you approach the neucleus

3. Electrons can change their orbits INSTANTANEOUSLY (this should be a dead give away)

I might edit the video to list the above points instead.

[vizierfennin]

@markstringf "In summary, I think you have a problem with the standard model in general, not just the electron."

I do have a problem with the entire model. The model I am proposing boils down to this: The entire universe is made up of neutral matter (photons) and magnets.

[Indagatoroculi]

would like to have a discussion with you about your theory. how we can share ..

[vizierfennin]

@Indagatoroculi email me at navyrob@gmail.com and ill give you my skype handle.

[lilisigel]

So are you saying about the atom is only nucleons and magnetic particles ? No protons ? and these magnetic particles have no names ? like for ex. electrons. What is wrong with the name electron ? I'm sorry but your presentation is kind of dubious.

[BIGWUNuvDbunch]

what, in this case is the force carrying particle of the magnet? this is all bullshit...

[projectmoses69]

I am amazed as to how much your diagrams resemble ancient symbols, tells me your on to something here, see part 6 of my video series to see what I mean. Keep up the good work, very insightful.

[BloodyAkuma]

Ancient philosophies & mythologies (still current in Asia) explain most everything regarding the cosmos, so long as you can see it for metaphor instead of taking it literally. No "particles" whatsoever, all energy, same substance/medium. Polarity, yes, but one "pole" is "stronger" than the other (still one substance) giving rise to vibrations & vortex actions, all fractal in nature. The universe & everything therein is astral music; varying frequencies & amplitudes of longitudinal waves [:

[thijid]

I like your magnetrons path ways, they interlock very well in a beautiful pattern, but have you tried creating it in 3d see what it looks like. I reconnized the pathways, the sort of ''s'' shape is the same as seen on ed. Leedskalnin's front page of his magnetic currents. sz

[thijid]

I like your magnetrons path ways, they interlock very well in a beautiful pattern, but have you tried creating it in 3d see what it looks like. I reconnized the pathways, the sort of ''s'' shape is the same as seen on ed. Leedskalnin's front page of his magnetic currents.

[markstringf]

In summary, I think you have a problem with the standard model in general, not just the electron.

[markstringf]

@vizierfennin

1) Self interference has been observed with things far larger than a single electron. De Broglie was onto something. Little balls interfering with each other doesn't make sense, you're right. It's been decades since physicists have thought of electrons as little charged balls.

2) Do you have a problem with photons? Consider pair production: Do photons need a "pocket" for the electron-positron pair?

3) Where is the problem? Electrons are not balls.

4) Who is making such a claim?