Channel No.5 with Nicole Kidman
Uploader Comments (Agrolass)
Top Comments
-
those 2 million could be feeding hungry kids in africa
the world is fucked up
-
is too fucking long for an advert
All Comments (56)
-
Give me a break!
-
took my breath away.
-
And I do agree with every1 here, a terrible waste of money.
-
I hate this advert so much!!! I hate the music, the stupid dialogue, everything, very unimaginative, its like the director has taken the moulin rouge script and updated it to the 21st century. Pure Pants!!
-
Well, there you go, 42 million, even worse than 2.
-
just so you know.... the budget for this ad was actually $42 million dollars....
that my friend..... is a WASTE
-
Love Nicole..the most beautiful woman
-
hey! there is nothing in the info. about about Rodrigo Santoro!!! of 300, love actually, and part of charlie's angels...
aiushaiushaiuhs
haha i just wanna congratulate him because, I'm proud, he went so far for a brazilian actor!! \0/ Viva Brasilll \0/
-
G'day mateys,
A very disappointing Kidman.
Here eyes wide open like a paranoid American mother in shock at seeing a man.
Also the spoken bit "I'm a dancer, I love to dance" has a crackle in her voice sounding more like a re-hab candidate than a lovely Aussie woman.
Very disappointed and the repeated airing of the ad drives me nuts
Bailing out now - busy as a cat buryin chit
Catchyalayda
Gari
-
More like taxpayers' money, but yeah whatever....
why was it so expensive? ive never seen the full version before its pretty mazing
LoveHopePassion 5 years ago
It's because it was filmed like a real movie. Not quite sure but that's what they said when it first came out.
Agrolass 5 years ago