Pre-Roman Britons & Post-Roman Anglo Saxons - DNA, Culture & Centuries apart!
Uploader Comments (celticcornish)
Top Comments
-
@EnglandPerson Hysterical! I see.... this video lies about DNA, but you have exclusive access to 'truthful' DNA videos? I've yet to see you substantiate any personal statement you've made with historical fact researched by you. All you do is send links to other videos and make unsubstantiated statements with no historical references. Your perspective/presentation is consistent in its lack of credibility.
-
@EnglandPerson I'm not disputing the notion that some people residing in modern-day England may have Celtic DNA or ancestry, WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT LIVING IN A CELTIC COUNTRY - dictated by the fact that the POST-ROMAN GERMANIC SAXON INVADERS MADE 'ANGLE-LAND' THEIR OWN WHEN THEY DROVE THE PRE-ROMAN CELTS TO THE EDGES OF THE BRITISH ISLES. If you self-identify as 'English' then that identity references post-roman Germanic, Saxon dominance; it's at odds with Celtic identity.
All Comments (20)
-
@StEdmundsandStGeorge But then, why should actual historical fact get in the way of a primary emotional response that the whole thing is simply about hate? Perish the thought that there could be some thinking behind any of it? Perish the thought that any complaint directed towards the administration may have substance or historic legal grounding....
-
@StEdmundsandStGeorge I tell you what... let's hit nobody. Instead, let's understand that we are legally different people who have been illegally assimilated; then let's acknowledge that that isn't defensible behaviour and make amends by reinstating legal borders and respectful acknowledgement that borders defined difference, reinforced by specific language and culture. It is pure ignorance to see a defense of legal, historic Cornish boundary as "anti-English".
-
@pilgim What is more 'romantic' - the belief that "Celt" is virtually an all-encompassing description, or that an actual language existed and was spoken by those firmly established in Celtic regions defined by their cultural/religious practices and behaviours - within their acknowledged, legal borders. I propose it is you who is 'romantic' in your belief that Celticness surrounds all; regardless of historically defined borders, languages and viscous (culturally-specific) conflicts.
-
England is no less celtic than Ireland or scotland etc,the word 'celtic' is a Roman word meaning barbarian and was applied to spain (celta iberia) and many places through out Europe,I think some people confuse celtic with ancient peoples such as the Druids who were just as prevalent in modern day England as anywhere else.Some of our most sacred sites(stone henge,silbury etc) are in England.I wish we could get over this romantic fantasy,sure it sells well to tourists but its unfounded
-
this is a myth the english laguage is germanic but there is a lot of latin in it to it doent mean it was always spoken
-
@celticcornish Correction: It's a Channel 4 feature, I believe.
If your grandfather was born in England you have a 75% chance of being descended from hunter gatherers who came here just after the last ice-age.
hetrodoxly 6 months ago
@hetrodoxly So what? In defense of the Cornish-not-English issue we are comparing 100+ years of English assimilation-by-stealth with 1400 years of legal/recognised Cornish difference & boundary. If we are using near history and longer-term history as the basis to define our credible identity, I'm going with the 1400 years of established Celtic-Cornish difference/documented cultural divide. Can anyone substantiate anything culturally relevant/useful using the 'hunter-gatherer' period?
celticcornish 2 months ago
The English are more mixed than the Cornish.
MultiTangle 11 months ago
@MultiTangle True - the DNA studies have illustrated this. Mass mobility into and out of Cornwall has been a fundamentally modern phenomenon.
celticcornish 2 months ago