Criminal State - Part 1 of 3: A Closer Look at Israel's Role in Terrorism
Uploader Comments (alawson911)
Top Comments
-
@sirbluff : So much for free speech.
-
The zio-trolls are just using their typical lies about virus and hate-speech about "waterboarding Jew-haters" just to get others to not look at your videos.
Pathetic scum of the earth.
Video Responses
All Comments (283)
-
Thank you so much for making and sharing these vids.
-
"...SPC manufactures equipment used to remotely fly planes... almost impossible maneuvers which flight #77 made on 9/11 piloted by an idiot... at that time by an Israel rabbi who had also lost or misplaced trillions of US government funds. As well, he was a contributor and supporter of a White Paper urging America to increase its defense budget and aggressively start to re-establish its world dominance and control (PNAC)... document that suggested...the event of a “New Pearl Harbor”.
-
Found at "The New Holy Trinity"
"Well, research shows that Dov worked at one time for a company named SPC. According to Wikipedia: “From 1987-2001, Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a subsidiary of System Planning Corporation, a high-technology analytical firm.” So what exactly does SPC do? Come on guess. Well let me tell you then, one project was the manufacturing of equipment to remotely pilot aircraft."
-
@wolfdaddy205 Might as well. That's what it is.
-
,,maybe we should be calling it the U.S.I.?
-
@alawson911 "some maintaining that this supported the no-planes theory," I had not picked up on that inference in their website.
-
@alawson911 I wholeheartedly believe that real planes started the attack.But i believe they were military planes or drones controlled by "hijack technology" by the FBI-CIA-NSA or some other alphabet agency who were planted in WTC7 where their 23rd floor"Base of Operations" was bombproofed-hurricane wind proofed&fully self sustaining with it's own source of Air&Water.I had friends who worked on this beefed up floor.Funny how only the 23rd floor was reinforced to sustain attacks by bombsINSIDE JOB
america is no longer free to the British Monarch. British Monarch and Israel hold most of the power, the bankers really who control and own those governments. All these wars are for the banking system, one world government that doesn't benefit the american people or the rest of the world. we need to wake up to reality
truthknowledge. com
MopDMTBARTL 7 months ago 2
@MopDMTBARTL
That is what royal weddings are about, but the Québécois are onto them. What a travesty, the propping up of such an outmoded form of financial elitism is. It is at the root of all elitism, and until people can see it for what it is, there will never be any form of fair government.
alawson911 6 months ago
"FBI AGENT BUTLER CASHED CHECKS AND PAID RENT FOR 2 SAN DIEGO BASED MEN WHO ALLEGEDLY PILOTED TWO OF THE PLANES ON 911."
The FBI was involved in PROTECTING the terrorist hijackers who worked for the US Government.They lived on Naval air bases & were taught by military trainers.
911=INSIDE JOB BY THE GOOD OLE USA.
ed11561 7 months ago
@ed11561
I very much doubt that the 9/11 planes, which have never been forensically identified, had pilots, but these "facts" are surfaced to keep the myth alive that hijacked planes were what caused all the damage on 9/11. However, whatever they were, and wherever they came from, the planes were real.
Please see my video: 9/11 -- The unidentified Murder Weapons
alawson911 6 months ago
@alawson911 I also believe that the planes(full size military drones)were controlled from WTC 7 & that there were Homing Devices planted in the Towers also.(Hence the large pods on the bottom of the planes) The Pilots for 911 Truth tried to simulate attacks on the WTC & they found it almost impossible to fly directly into the towers most of the time according to the routes used by the planes on 911. I'll check out your film. Thanks.
ed11561 6 months ago
@ed11561
I agree with many of your "beliefs" but I prefer the word "think". On the issue of a homing device, the nose cone of a 767-lookalike would have ample room for such a device, but remote control is more likely. One of the problems I have with Pilots for 9/11 Truth is ambivalence about the issue of piloting skills, some maintaining that this supported the no-planes theory, when it is obvious that computer-assisted remote control was more than a viable possibility.
The pods
alawson911 6 months ago