A Brief History of Neoliberalism by David Harvey 5/5
Top Comments
All Comments (61)
-
(continued), and companies that go out and build something should be more prevalent than companies that trick the government into large transfers of wealth via privatization. The Neoliberal's own theories would come around to this if they were more introspective. For example, Milton Friedman once said, whatever a society rewards, it finds it get's more of. This profit habit is all you need to know in order to realize that there will never be a privatization sale via public IPO.
-
kids, kids, settle down.
It is pretty obvious that for free market capitalism to work, companies need to be motivated in such a way that their best outcomes are outcomes the rest of us would find acceptable. By way of analogy, society should reward better the person who saves up and buys a VCR more than the person who breaks a window and takes one. Similarly, companies who use safe mining techniques that don't drop arsenic in drinking water should find that's a competitive advantage.
-
@quixotic115 I fapped to this.
-
@Underground906 Why, then, were the bankers bailed out? Why does the US taxpayer fund Lockheed Martin (the failed aviation company)?Why does the US government subidise oil?Why are cheaper foreign import medicines not allowed in America?Why is Monsanto subsidised by the US taxpayer and allowed to bully American farmers?Why are government contracts handed out to companies without bids?
I believe that private corporations should not be given a dime of US taxpayer's money.
End all corporate welfare.
-
The funny thing is Friedrich Hayek was a welfare sponger, who used the wlefare systems he claimed to despise.
When the Kochs invited him to America Hayek worried that he wouldn't get any medical benefits, so they sent him a pamphlet about the wonders of US social welfare.
Hayek sponged off Austrian and US taxpayers, what a hypocritical scumbag.
-
Go Communism whoop whoop!!
-
@bapyou ''And who decides? Right-wingers? What a stupid fuck you are.'' The fact that the only alternative to you in who gets to decide must be right-wingers, and that fact that you assume I meant that shows what a complete fucking idiot you are. Like every single other postering lefty moron I have come across, you think in stereotypes and mischaraterization when it comes to people who disagree and never the real reality for why they do. I'm from the UK. You know nothing you cliche.
-
@Underground906 "You don't get to decide the definition of Left-wing"
And who decides? Right-wingers? What a stupid fuck you are.
"Socialism/Communism . . . that is 'left-wing', and nothing else."
Correct. And throw in the anarchists as well. Those constitute left-wing; not pro-capitalist Democrats. In Europe these are the parameters that are understood.
In America propgandized dolts like you -- incapable of farting crosswise in the dark -- think they actually know something.
Go F urself.
-
@bapyou You fucking jumped up little turd. You don't get to decide the definition of Left-wing you fucking cock. You're talking specifically about Socialism/Communism and saying that is 'left-wing', and nothing else is. Which is ridiculous. ''True'' Left-Wing? You just go on to repeat and reaffirm what I said in my earlier post to you. There is a reason why all anti-capitalist governments have murdered so many dissenters. They are full of hateful nutcases like you.
-
@Underground906 Yes, the Democrats are NOT left-wing. Sorry to burst your bubble, you right-wing dolt. The Democrats are as much a capitalist party as the Republicans. True left-wing is anti-capitalist; always has been the true definition of left-wing. The fact that right-wing dolts like you brand Democrats as "left-wing" is a tactic which limits possibilities, i.e. the Democrats are already left-wing, therefore there isn't anything that needs to be done beyond electing more Democrats. Fuck you.
"If it looks like class war, and it feels like class war, why don't we call it class war? And why don't we engagde in it back?"
Awesome vid. Remember Anticonsumer.
vforvoltaire 4 years ago 26
stfu you dumb piece of right wing shit. You're obviously a retard who would support going against his own interests, unless you happen to be one of those wealthy Americans, which you probably aren't any. You're probably just a dumbass. Reagan wouldn't have given two shits about you.
quixotic115 3 years ago 12