I am not sure one should trust "consciousness" too much. I personally like the Heideggerian Dasien better. The acute sense of concern about the meaning of Being. But then maybe this is all old hate to you. I person dies three times. One is this existentiell. I don't know where the other two death comes from(???)
at times abound superlatives on occasion not a sound other moments demure ontology certainly uncertain to a certain (un)certainty uncomfortable unknowing where life leads (what it means) is joy compared to the monotony of knowing and so elapsed frustration is oiled by the elixir of laughter, learning, love running free
I must agree with you. The shift from epistemology to ontology is unavoidable. We got this mess of language. The only way to get out of it, is to drop the dualistic subject-object mentality. The subject-subject is a completely different ball game.
I think boundless understanding is always formless. With the word comes the fall, the idyll is destroyed by something that is dual in its nature.
The probability of our ideas being sufficiently close to one another is mostly small and when we enter this zone this we know the uptake.
The thing is we still need structure to get to the zone or mostly the skeptic part is unsure of resonance, maybe future technologies are able to facilitate exchange without language
more personal I think that yes, dialogue is wanting to connect, which is what instincts, will, consciousness does. Inclusiveness regardless of having similar artful patterns, like logic, worked out is a central theme of green as opposed to orange.
In 2nd tier exchange, differences are acknowledge since all participants are comfortably secured with bungee cords in bigmindheart; one might deflect but stays where one is in regard to the essential.
I am not sure one should trust "consciousness" too much. I personally like the Heideggerian Dasien better. The acute sense of concern about the meaning of Being. But then maybe this is all old hate to you. I person dies three times. One is this existentiell. I don't know where the other two death comes from(???)
Israe5l 1 year ago
I am very disturbed by the behaviour of many students, studying on the university, they tend to get very political correct.
Spiritual intuition, Imagination and fantasy are very important elements that NEEDS to be used to become a better thinker.
LOVE is a more powerfull effect, we NEED to make a lot of mistakes in our philosophy to become good PROFFESORS!!
YourFuture2012 2 years ago
worldnative 2 years ago
I must agree with you. The shift from epistemology to ontology is unavoidable. We got this mess of language. The only way to get out of it, is to drop the dualistic subject-object mentality. The subject-subject is a completely different ball game.
Israe5l 2 years ago
Fascinating material in this video. I'd like to see 5 thousand views here instead of 5 hundred.
otonanoC 2 years ago
a question could be: whether
the co-evolution of
biology and
communication (technologies)
contributes to higher and higher levels of epistemological potential for actualizing ontology
almafarag 2 years ago 2
The technological thing watch?v=vGNvP75UYGE is disturbing and should be considered a long time before we implement it at all.
Other consciousness areas have not even nearly kept us with the technological perception.
hyperseauton 2 years ago
excuse the reductionist orange drowse but only in this manner I felt to make the point in text.
hyperseauton 2 years ago
I think boundless understanding is always formless. With the word comes the fall, the idyll is destroyed by something that is dual in its nature.
The probability of our ideas being sufficiently close to one another is mostly small and when we enter this zone this we know the uptake.
The thing is we still need structure to get to the zone or mostly the skeptic part is unsure of resonance, maybe future technologies are able to facilitate exchange without language
hyperseauton 2 years ago
more personal I think that yes, dialogue is wanting to connect, which is what instincts, will, consciousness does. Inclusiveness regardless of having similar artful patterns, like logic, worked out is a central theme of green as opposed to orange.
In 2nd tier exchange, differences are acknowledge since all participants are comfortably secured with bungee cords in bigmindheart; one might deflect but stays where one is in regard to the essential.
hyperseauton 2 years ago