Creationists brag that they are doing "real" science. But real scientists work hard to put their hypotheses to the test. Why don't creationists do the same?
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN youre the idot without any authority to speak on any subject. Do some research and you'll find that evolution has been irrefutably proved- Im very sorry that cant accept it but wont make it any less true.As to your absurd hypothesis(if it can be called that) above there- you have NO idea how science works AT ALL! So to use your own words again YOU ARE A TOTAL MORON!
@xdassinx You’re the Idiot without authority to speak on any subject; your hearsay fallacious rant is your own worthless opinion. The act of acquiring knowledge is not evidence of evolution. Studying biology or any other disciple is not evidence of evolution because Pond Scum to Human evolution never happened, or happens and cannot happen in defiance of the applicable laws of science. Therefore, it is impossible to have science about Evolution from chemical elements to you. You are a total MORON
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Wow, you gave me a position. I've only been asking for a hypothesis for a week now. And what a position it is. The old "things are so amazing, maybe if I stayed awake in Biology 101 I'd know the answer to some of it but I didn't so I'll have to blame God" position. Your failure is complete.
Now, go to my channel and check out my Irreducible Complexity Pwnd playlist. If you're going to go around spewing Behe's crap you should know what an idiot he's making you look like.
@xdassinx I gave you the Creationist position as the name implies i.e. A Creator who is intelligent, more intelligent than all humans combined made all that exists. The testable claim is that all that is created is intelligently created i.e. observation will show complexity, aesthetics, purpose, function, dependency, irreducible complexity,etc. Because it is intelligently designed, humans can learn from what God created i.e. Biomimicry and which human intelligence cannot replicate or materials.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I didn't assert any logic I asked you to show me a creationist hypothesis and how you'd test it.
So you're going with the old "Everything needs a maker" argument. Not really a hyopthesis, but if that's what you want to go with knock yourself out. *snicker*
So Dr. Religious Fanatic. Care to explain how you are going to test this hypothesis? Or are you going to rely on the observation that animals build homes and chemicals don't. Nor do chemicals buy furniture you forgot that.
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I told you to cut your unsubstantiated ranting and put up or shut up. Are you, or are you not, going to provide evidence that Noah's ark as described in the Bible could really have been built and withstand the forces of a global flood? No creationist non-peer reviewed "studies," no pseudo-arks using steel reinforcement. This is your final chance. One more childish outburst which avoids your burden of proof and you're outta here. Capice?
@xdassinx the Lame Atheist that loves fallacious logic. Stop your hearsay responses which are unsubstantiated allegations.
The Creationist Claim/Science is that God, a superior intelligent being, created all that exists. This is the only possibility that Real Science can support.
Here is an analog from God's creation: all His creatures with intelligence can be intelligent things or contrive dwelling places i.e. insect > Hive, Bird > Nest and Humans building structures. Chemical elements cannot
wow- this truthbeknown person=biggest nutter since shockofgod-*shakes head*
dancingnancy09 1 month ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN youre the idot without any authority to speak on any subject. Do some research and you'll find that evolution has been irrefutably proved- Im very sorry that cant accept it but wont make it any less true.As to your absurd hypothesis(if it can be called that) above there- you have NO idea how science works AT ALL! So to use your own words again YOU ARE A TOTAL MORON!
dancingnancy09 1 month ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN And, with that childish outburst you are outta here!
brettppalmer 1 month ago
@xdassinx You’re the Idiot without authority to speak on any subject; your hearsay fallacious rant is your own worthless opinion. The act of acquiring knowledge is not evidence of evolution. Studying biology or any other disciple is not evidence of evolution because Pond Scum to Human evolution never happened, or happens and cannot happen in defiance of the applicable laws of science. Therefore, it is impossible to have science about Evolution from chemical elements to you. You are a total MORON
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 month ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Wow, you gave me a position. I've only been asking for a hypothesis for a week now. And what a position it is. The old "things are so amazing, maybe if I stayed awake in Biology 101 I'd know the answer to some of it but I didn't so I'll have to blame God" position. Your failure is complete.
Now, go to my channel and check out my Irreducible Complexity Pwnd playlist. If you're going to go around spewing Behe's crap you should know what an idiot he's making you look like.
xdassinx 1 month ago
@xdassinx I gave you the Creationist position as the name implies i.e. A Creator who is intelligent, more intelligent than all humans combined made all that exists. The testable claim is that all that is created is intelligently created i.e. observation will show complexity, aesthetics, purpose, function, dependency, irreducible complexity,etc. Because it is intelligently designed, humans can learn from what God created i.e. Biomimicry and which human intelligence cannot replicate or materials.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 month ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I didn't assert any logic I asked you to show me a creationist hypothesis and how you'd test it.
So you're going with the old "Everything needs a maker" argument. Not really a hyopthesis, but if that's what you want to go with knock yourself out. *snicker*
So Dr. Religious Fanatic. Care to explain how you are going to test this hypothesis? Or are you going to rely on the observation that animals build homes and chemicals don't. Nor do chemicals buy furniture you forgot that.
xdassinx 1 month ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN I told you to cut your unsubstantiated ranting and put up or shut up. Are you, or are you not, going to provide evidence that Noah's ark as described in the Bible could really have been built and withstand the forces of a global flood? No creationist non-peer reviewed "studies," no pseudo-arks using steel reinforcement. This is your final chance. One more childish outburst which avoids your burden of proof and you're outta here. Capice?
brettppalmer 1 month ago
@xdassinx the Lame Atheist that loves fallacious logic. Stop your hearsay responses which are unsubstantiated allegations.
The Creationist Claim/Science is that God, a superior intelligent being, created all that exists. This is the only possibility that Real Science can support.
Here is an analog from God's creation: all His creatures with intelligence can be intelligent things or contrive dwelling places i.e. insect > Hive, Bird > Nest and Humans building structures. Chemical elements cannot
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 month ago