JFK assassination re-enactment
Uploader Comments (10Garmonbozia01)
Top Comments
-
Oh yeah, Amazingly enough, this is the ACTUAL secret service car that was following JFK's limo when he was assassinated and blood droplets were found on the windshield afterward. Why the actual Lincoln Continental that Kennedy was killed in was not used for the reenactment (for more realistic and accurate scenario) has never been released as far as I know. Again...Nice posting
-
The re-enactment was a joke.They didn't even use the same type of car as JFK was in on 22nd Nov 1963. The car used in the re-enactment sat about two feet higher than the Lincoln Continental used on 22nd Nov 1963 thus making the so-called re-enactment pointless and futile.
All Comments (37)
-
I was invited to the re-enactment Jackie was there in the car they needed it for the zapruder film hoax.
-
I was there at th re-enactment. Do you have any images of a 9 year old boy wearing a marine jacket.
-
@DKetch1966 It's not clear why they didn't use the actual car for the recreation. but they ripped out the interior of the JFK death car, refurbished it and continued to use it for Johnson.
-
wow, this is amazing. Looks like the actual film footage shot in late 1963 in a reenactment of the assassination by the Secret Service, I had seen still pics of this, but had not seen nor even known of an actual film of the reenactment. It is supposed to be from the same position Abe Zapruder filmed the murder. Where in world did you find/get this anyway?
Thx for posting.
-
INVASTIGATION SOLVED!!! ..WATCH THIS CLIP !!!!!
watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo&feature=re lated
SPREAD THE WORD !!!!!!!
-
He tested negative for the paraffin test on his cheek meaning he didn't fire a rifle that day. The positive nitrate test for his hands meant to the WC truth seekers that he had fired a pistol, and had therefore killed Tippet. The nitrate test can produce false positives from numerous sources. One such false reading source was likely if the person tested had been in contact with cardboard boxes. Oswald was in the TSBD all day prior to the assassination doing-yeah you guessed it. WC is pure lie.
-
Keep in mind that Oswald may not have even fired the shot. Their is evidence that he was related to the assassination, but none to prove he actually shot his rifle, there were no traces of gunpowder on Oswald's person when he was investigated.
-
No matter how hard they tried to make bullet 399 seem possible it just couldn't work. They couldn't even get the "bunched coat" bullet hole crock of shit theory to match. Same result with their fudged shooting re enactment done at a different location, with less to no obstructions, from a shorter distance and height, performed by the FBI's TOP shooters. NOT ONE could duplicate the purported Oswald shoot. Lies are like a bucket of shit. The more you stir it the worse the smell gets.
They were trying to locate the 'earliest' position that the Limo would have to have been in, in order to Oswald having the proper view. Thus supporting the conclusion of a lone gunman, made officially minutes after the assassination.
10Garmonbozia01 5 years ago
The reenactment in February '64 was conducted primarily by the FBI. The one in May '64 was merely done on the behalf of the WCR, with the data collected from the two previous ones. Go to The Educational Forum
10Garmonbozia01 5 years ago
It may well be in May. Are you sure it is not from the re-enactment done in February '64, or the days 2nd-5th of December '63? That is of importance.
10Garmonbozia01 5 years ago