Michael Jackson Immortal - Album REVIEW

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,604
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2011

A review from a Michael Jackson fan.. and no, it's not all positive.

twitter.com/tabloidjunk

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TJVlogs)

  • Let me ask you this. Why would the estate get fake singer to sing the tracks when they could just use other tracks?? Doesn't that debunk the fake mj vocals at least a LITTLE?

  • @mjwc97 Notice there have been no tracks released that were produced by Will.i.am, or Rodney Jerkins, or RedOne?

    Those guys know that the executors are far more interested in lining their own pockets with cash, than honoring MJ's legacy...

    The estate cannot release a song without the producers permission.. So maybe they felt the remaining unreleased material wasn't up to scratch? That might explain why they decided to include 3 Cascio tracks.

  • Before you talk so much s*** about the Cascio tracks saying that their not MJ prove it.

    Because 2 forensic musicologists, MJ's producers, MJ's friends, etc believe it MJ.

  • @ADKIc3mAnX36O Yeah, the "forensic Musicologists" you mention were employed by Sony.. so of course they were going to give the result Sony were looking for.

    So far, those paid 'experts', and the word of Eddie Cascio are the only proof we've been provided that it's Michael's voice on those songs.

    No footage, and not even any vocal outtakes.

    Not to mention.. the biggest problem.. The voice sounds EXACTLY like Malachi.

  • @TJVlogs Well if it was "Fake" that would be illegal and it would destroy Sony, Epic Records, and Michael Jackson's estate and just for 3 songs they would risk all of that ?

    And the album sold 2.5M copies official sales that means they would have to issue a recall that would be hell why risk so much for just 9 minutes or so of music.

  • @ADKIc3mAnX36O Correct.. the kind of fraud that's been committed IS illegal, and that's exactly why they are bullying, and trying to silence fans like myself who are speaking out against them.. take a look at the video i posted a few days ago called "Freedom Of Speech.. Not On YouTube".. you'll see what i mean.

Top Comments

  • @simbij if his work was UNFINISHED, that means it shouldn't be released.

    If someone found a vault of unfinished Picasso paintings, and then splashed on some more paint till it looked satisfactory in his eyes, and then released it as a "Picasso", is that ok? No!

    Of course i want to hear more of Michael's music.. but he's gone. He's not here to create music anymore... Adding new beats, instruments, and VOCALS to something Michael hadn't finished working on is NOT the same thing.

see all

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I just read that Latojah Jackson( might have spelled her name wrong) is saying, thats not her brothers voice. Even MJ's daughter is saying the same thing. They used his copycat to record some of the songs.

  • I FUCKING LOVE YOU, You are so outspoken and you get right to the point. Thank you.

  • LOL "they haven't fucked with it too much" 

  • @TJVlogs I seen it but still to me it sounds like MJ and I don't think MJ's estate would do something like that for 3 songs I mean come on they have hundreds in their vaults.

  • SONY SUCK 

  • @TJVlogs TJ,

    You're fantastic you're so outspoken! I mean this all in a good way....

    Harp..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more