port arthur massacre martin bryant setup pt 2
Uploader Comments (mashj50)
All Comments (198)
-
It's all about disarming the ppl so that when they institute marshal law to usher in the new world order the ppl won't be able to resist, we are virtually disarmed in Australia and the nwo has big ideas for this countries mineral wealth
-
Ppl look up Monark slaves. This Port Arthur atrocity has all the hallmarks of a mind control action. Look up how the Americans took head nazis back to the US after the war to continue their work on mind control, in particular mind controll of the masses. These nazis were well down the path of understanding and using serious mind control techniques. The Giifords shooting recently in the US has the same hallmarks and the anti gun lobby there is extreme and pushing for gun law changes.
-
@9:07 when he's replaying the audio it sounds like 2 different types of gunshots, like 2 different calibres, or is this just some echo from the louder of the 2? Either way Bugg must not have heard this to give such testimony as he did. Or did he lie for some reason?
-
@mashj50 It's just like the story around the US congresswoman and the judge that was suppossedly shot by some white supremacist. It's all lies,as the US comedian Carlin said "i live by a few rules number 1 is i don't believe anything the govt tell me,zero"
-
Same MO as all false flags,Bryant that he was part of a police exercise,he was groomed to be the patsy like Oswald.He was meant to die,so they locked and will drug him to death.The two men who did the shooting will pay in time.The reason for "the lone" killer is ,if it more than one killer,there has to be inquiry & is taken out of the controllers hands.The fact that the gun was handed into a cop shop months earlier says it all.
-
Here's the solution:
next time there is a huge catastrophe/killing/bombing/tr
agedy. The crime scene and suspects should be subject to the due process of law and all evidence presented regardless of how 'hard it is for the families' because if these events are so open-and-shut cases ( e.g. Port Arthur, 7/7, 9/11). then surely the legal process will find no difficulty presenting the incriminating evidence for everyone to see. its all about the lack of normal procedures. DON'T DESTROY EVIDENCE
-
Remember, politicians are the public's servants, not the public's masters.
-
@Stringyheads Yes and the Broad Arrow Cafe, gets demolished in December 96, a faulty door which victims couldnt get out of, calls also for an inquiry. There are just to many questions, and so much more that could have been learnt, so as this not happen again. Thats how we all learn,I totally agree with your comment.
-
Amazing how if one person gets murdered the investigation and search for forensics can take years. The do test firing of the gun used and check point for bullet entery and where the shooter was located at each shot. Basicly work to no end to find answers. Clearly here that did not happen even with the number of fitalities. I totaly agree with all speakers in this excellent presentation
I have impartially been reading both sides of the argument regarding Port Arthur and I will not draw any conclusions based on internet opinions or what the main stream media says. However if there be any doubt beyond reason that the official version is flawed then there ought to be a royal commission into this case. This of course should have been done in the first place, and you people flaming channels like this for asking questions are nothing but products of media and ignorant dictators.
MilitiaHQ 7 months ago
@MilitiaHQ Thx for the balanced response , law seems to be the first casualty of Port Arthur,
mashj50 7 months ago
Yet a police video tape exists which proves that the police had an excellent opportunity to get DNA samples and finger prints of the gunman.
The video briefly shows the blue sports bag on a cafe table. The gunman had carried his 3 rifles in this bag and left it right next to his drinking glass, his Solo soft drink can, knife, fork, plate, etc.
Why did the police fail to take DNA samples and finger prints?
StradleZ 7 months ago
@StradleZ that's simple they weren't Bryants !! fuck me the last thing you would want around is real evidence of who did it !! better to leave the car doors open all night so the dew can sponge away any prints, ever heard of Lee Harvey Oswald ? Osama Bin Laden ? Timothy McVeigh? the 7/7 bombers ?, the term Fall Guy ? this is standard Illuminati play book stuff, It is so simple it's not funny , Pick a dummy and tell him you want to play cops and robbers and he's in !!! Little Marty has a color tv
mashj50 7 months ago