The Pop-Up Two Buck Stove 01
Uploader Comments (lannyplans)
All Comments (130)
-
hey lanny,great idea,great vid.very clever,buddyboy
-
CLEVER !! Cheap-and-easy-to-build , on top of it all a by-product of charcoal . GOOD STUFF LANNY !!
-
Well looks good , good intention it works for doing camping, explorers, people who doesn't need heavy things, who walks light, and until there.. And for a cowboy well not they can use only one can.. Se ve bien, buen intento, buena intencion, bueno para campamentos, exloradores o gente que no necesita cargar cosas pesadas, ya para un vaquero pues como que no porque nomas se utiliza un bote y nomas..
-
Yeah, impressive!
-
Excellent!!!!
-
can you sell this to me
-
Great flix. This uses very little fuel and could be used in refugie contitions. Maybe in USA soon but certenaly in Africa and other countries with military dictators. Not in USA only because we have weapons. I expect they will soon try and reposess those weapons. Even if your ancesters were slaves arm your self all our ancesters were slaves and I rather be a free man.
-
this should be in "saw 7" movie.
-
@ aldenbuzz , ya if you are gonna use those galvanized cans you should at least burn and clean the teflon out them first. Stainless or ti is much better for the food contact container, next al, and if an emergency then galv, but still don't let it run dry or you're gonna get some toxic fumes inside and out.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If it takes close to 20 minutes to boil a litre of water it's not exactly energy efficient. And using wood as fuel isn't exactly green living.
Amateur1994 2 years ago
150 grams of wood boiled a liter and made 21 grams of char. What would be an efficient score for You?
and 20 min is a reasonable time to bring a liter to a boil considering it takes time to start a wood fire.
continued...
lannyplans 2 years ago 4
Green? Burning wood instead of fossil fuels is very Green, if you are talking about CO2. Burning wood is carbon neutral, because it is carbon that is already in the carbon cycle as opposed to gas or coal which brings new carbon into the atmosphere. Burning wood is actually carbon negative if you save the charcoal and use it for biochar. Also burning wood releases CO2, but decaying wood releases methane which is a worse green house gas than CO2
Thanks for viewing.
lannyplans 2 years ago 24