THE TROTSKY

No description available.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• trotsky

[jaking10]

except lenin didn't actually name trotsky as his successor, he never actually named one before his death, he did however most likely plan for Trotsky, to take over. Lenin also said he didn't want Stalin too take over, because he was too violent and rash.

[crazycamel345]

@shyF0x nice spelling ass fuck.

[vvNKVD]

@AndrejZdanov VIVA IL COMPAGNO GIUSEPPE STALIN, TERRORE DEI FASCISTI, TERRORE DEI PADRONI!

[AndrejZdanov]

Glory to Comrade Stalin! Trotskyism is a reactionary ideology.

[arzoyan]

@jaking10 The so called alternative to WESTERN PRIVATE CAPITALISM has been STATE CAPITALISM OF ASIATIC MODALITY, in USSR case it restructrued itself and China should soon become the biggest WORLD CAPITALIST MARKET. The only real alternative is TO SHARE THE EARTH IN COOPERATION in a moneyless,classless,stateless communities of humanity where we express our multitude of creative energies in freedom of being rather the current minority tyrannical ABSTRACT ACCUMULATION and CONCENTRATION.

[unifieddynasty]

@jaking10 It's been a year, I know, I know. But I must point out your ability to leave out that Lenin also did not want Trotsky to be his successor either. Remember, Trotsky was credited by Lenin as being a factionalist harming of the structural integrity of the party. I'm sure Lenin did not like any of the directors on his board, since they were all too... bureaucratic and serving in self-interest. He most likely planned to disband the committee and start anew.

[Treldman]

3 people are fascists.

[Treldman]

@Bertramsharpshot Ending credits.

[pulpficfan1]

@jaking10 Lenin did name Trotsky his heir, Its in Lenin's testament, a document that Josef Stalin intercepted from the ailing Lenin before it made it to the politburo. Lenin's testament called for Stalin to be removed from all political office and dealt with severally for he was an "Evil" man in the words of Lenin. It also called for the halting of bureaucratic growth which threatened the development of true socialistic or communistic progresses.

[expotl]

@WSWarthog I agree with that, but his successor was Brezhnev, and the Brezhenv era was the economically most succesful time for the soviet union, the living standards rose a lot, but of course it was also a time political stagnancy, the whole thing started to go wrong under gorbachev, because of his naive reformist policy, some people say: "it was the only thing he could have done", but he ruined the whole system, destroyed the world-wide united workers liberation, that's a fact

[WSWarthog]

@expotl

Well I'm not saying Wikipedia is the be-all end-all but they do cite sources in that article. But it's not necessary to argue over this since you agree that Kruschev's agriculture policy was a bit crazy. I really don't doubt Kruschev's sincerity in wanting to improve the life of the Soviet people, that's the last thing anyone can accuse him of. It's just that he made a lot of mistakes, and under him central planning began started to fail.