L'Internationale(Russian)
Uploader Comments (BrooklynNY1992)
All Comments (16)
-
no offense, but why are all the photos in this video of political leaders? no pictures of ordinary workers, peasants etc. the people who were supposedly going to benefit most from a revolution...no pictures of strikes or labor unions.
-
@ 0:24
Mao Tse-Tung? You support the Cultural Revolution, the torture and public humiliation of intellectuals, the burning of books, the personality cult of the 'great helmsman"? You might as well include Henry Kissinger in your vid, since the PLA and CIA were on the same side against the Soviets...
-
One day, capitalism will fall, and socialist will dominate the earth. Just like how they did to us!
VIVA LA REVOLUTION! FIGHT BEGINS 2012!!!
-
@Congamako I really agree that Stalin was the man for the task, and that Fidel, Tito, etc were revisionist__ Krushchev and his succesor and were revisionist indeed: They took the name of marxism while being buorgeois: every revisiost is a traitor, a communist can´t be so. Now, what do you undestand by reivisionist? and why you regard Stalin and Mao as such. Remember Lenin said Berstein and Kautsky were revisionist, and they were traitors of the proletariat.
-
@Hablacausa1987 : Another thing: revisionist is not that. Revisionism and heretics have common roots, meaning "a different point of view". What you call (you and thousands of others in the last 50 years) revisionists are, in fact, merely traitors. Stalin, Mao, Tito, Fidel, Machel were revisionists for the wealth of the ideals, while Trotsky, Kruchtchev, Brejnev, Andropov, Gorbatchev and the likes were simply traitors, bourgeois scum. (Bukharin was no less stupid than Tchernenko later on)
-
@Hablacausa1987 : he also wrote that Zinoviev was two soft to take charge of that immense responsibility; too weak and too undecided. And that Stalin (already secretary general of the party), although rude, was the man for the task.
-
@ComradeLenin1289 : Your second and third sentences are obviously wrong. False. Untrue. However, you are entitled to consider Stalin revisionist in the sense that he built a strong state from and by the party (for the good of the people) instead of strengthen the people's organisations to build a strong nation. In his time, having regard to the international blocus and continuous acts of war against the USSR, I don't believe he could do differently to save the ideal. Revisionist as he should be!
-
everone loved Che
-
Tell me WHERE did Lenin "denounced" Stalin. WHEN did he said Trosky should be his succesor. Lenin believed in the proletarian´peasant alliance and also in the possibility of the triump of the revolution in a single country, Trosky didnt. Its clear that during the revolution Trosky had a "third faction". The purges were against anti-bolcheviks (as Lenin called them): Kamenev, Zinoviev and Bujarin (the capitalist proaders). Stalin had seriuos mistakes, but he was the best Marxist-Leninist backthen
hmmm.... Хорошая музыка я люблю мелодию, но это не половина столь же хорошего как "гимн Soveit", почему Вы не используете не prodictable картины, хотя я подразумеваю, что Вы только использовали Ленина, Mao, Троцкого и Сталина что относительно Хошимина или сметь, я говорю это Тито?
Peadarisback 3 years ago
OH!! I was going to use pictures of Tito and Ho Chi but I forgot about them.
BrooklynNY1992 3 years ago