Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

LHC = For tourist

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
376 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 16, 2008

There is only one element who changing and it is not space who changing. Energy changing not so density energy in space who is not changing at all. Space dont expanding Hokkus Pokkus!

What you are going to do with LHC? Why you didnt asking to me, how Universe working? Then you didnt need to make LHC! I already know how Universe working, so, you can using LHC for tourism!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Etimespace)

  • There is only energy and space. Density of energy changing in space who dont change at all.

    Check out physorg com news

    Huge undersea mountain found off Indonesia: scientists

    i profetian, that mountain getting bigger "fast".

    check out also my video

    Himalaya mountains

    Jukteri

    change of pressure.

  • How can something move 1 light year in a second?

    A light year is the distance that light speed travels in one year

    1 year has circa 31 536 000 seconds

    WTF TRAVELS 31 563 000 times faster then Light?!?!?!?!?

    btw the English is horrible

    but I like some other vids ;)

  • Sorry, i never check out what i speak that video. if i am saying one lightyear, it is post to be one lightsecend ofcourse!

  • Meanwhile, Professor Carroll urged cosmologists to broaden their horizons: "We're trained to say there was no time before the Big Bang, when we should say that we don't know whether there was anything - or if there was, what it was.

    If the Caltech team's work is correct, we may already have the first information about what came before our own Universe."

  • Detailed measurements made by the satellite have shown that the fluctuations in the microwave background are about 10% stronger on one side of the sky than those on the other.

    Sean Carroll conceded that this might just be a coincidence, but pointed out that a natural explanation for this discrepancy would be if it represented a structure inherited from our universe's parent.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think he means the ship is moving so fast that it needs only 1 second of ship's time to travel approximately 27*10^9 ly - which would be slightly slower than lightspeed. But do lorentz contraction or time dilatation in the scientific sense apply to his "cosmological model" at all?

    There's no "boundary" the ship could reach. The universe looks the same from every observation point. That's one main idea of relativistic physics - there's no "special" or "most important" location in the universe.

  • no problem bro :D

  • Time observed at the origin is slower, whereas time towards approaching observed objects is faster.

    Imagine a movie with images streaming outwards from all observable locations, if moving away from observed object images are received slower, whereas when moving towards an object it's images are received faster... relative to time of actual events of observed objects, and observed objects only.

  • The diagram of observable universe is wrong, because from original centre spaceship is moving away at or bellow light speed. Therefore the origin is always visible. Also the difference between speed of spaceship and speed of light from origin is proportional to the distance observable beyond the origin over time.

    Any location beyond the spaceship will be observable after the time it takes for the light to travel the distance between them plus the rate of change in distance between them.

  • ASSUMING big bang happened:

    Spaceship is moving in a direction from centre.

    Therefore, whatever is moving away from the spaceship at a rate greater than the speed of light is not observable from it.

    An object distancing itself at the speed of light...?

    An object distancing itself at less than the speed of light...?

    An object approaching at, less than, or above the speed of light...?

    From intial, objects would be either moving in the same hemi-spheric direction or the opposite,faster/slower

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more