M16A2 vs. AN-94 assault rifle [TEST FIRE]
Top Comments
All Comments (1,426)
-
the AN94 is so good that almost every country wants to buy......oh wait, no they dont
-
@Doughman824 USA propaganda "AKA 'war movies/games' give people that idea. a soldier is only as good as his willingness to self sacrifice and training, which is why americans will never conquor asia or middle east directly. that's why they purposely throw countries they "liberate". kill the old dictator, create anarchy, new leader emerges, talk to new leader, remind him what happened to the old boss, then take all the country's shit, rinse and repeat
-
@proxynation of coarse.....
btw no point in m16 to AN94 comparison anyway, most ppl with an m16 put their own modifications on it anyway, like upper receiver replacements. check out the HK416 or better the M6A2, same base, far better.
-
@FrankDaTank1218 Because we ended up demolishing south vietnam even though we tried to pacify it. Not only that, but we were forced into countless armed conflicts in South Vietnam. Also, the fact Russians lost their weapons was not why they lost. I'm sure the training of the rebels from american forces had a much larger impact.
-
@MegaBuster777 Don't know what you mean by "flatten South Vietnam. Also, your excuse for Russia losing Afghanistan was because they were incompetent enough to get their weapons stolen?
Its funny how some people just like m16 better cause they live in US and thinks Russia sucks...
Doughman824 3 months ago 36
The soldier says that the Nikonov is better! I dont even know how to speak Russian, but I can tell! thumbs up if you agree! :D
proxynation 4 months ago 34