Australian open - Sampras v.s Agassi

who won the match?

Well you are changing your argument here. I agree that Nadal relies heavily on hitting to Federer's BH.

I take it then, that you agree that Nadal's FH is a skillful shot, that outside of high bouncing clay Nadal's strategy also needs to be backed up with aggressive groundstrokes, and that no ordinary tennis player can take advantage of Federer's BH?

You are perfectly allowed to like and dislike whatever players you want, but I take issue with the fact that you have been completely misrepresenting Nadal's game. Just simply saying "I don't like Nadal because of x and y." would have been enough.

And I'd cut down on the childish insults you've been hurling at Nadal, if I were you. I suppose you won't listen but it doesn't reflect too well on yourself.

no i dont agree and this is so beside the point. im talking about nadals strategy being simple and you KEEP TALKING ABOUT HIS STYLE OF FOREHAND which i dont give a fuck about. and yes no one else takes advantage of him, he's perfect for beating federer which is why "if A beats B, A is better than B" is often not true in tennis cos its so much about match ups. nadal would be lucky to have 2 or 3 majors now if he'd played finals against JMDP or nalbandian, who often butcher him

You have changed your argument multiple times and I have responded each time. Don't pretend as though I've been irrelevant when it's YOU who keeps changing your argument without acknowledging it.

Firstly, you suggested that Nadal's FH was somehow 'easy' to hit and that a 'well-trained gorilla' could hit it. I disagreed, and this is where I talked about mechanics. Then you claimed that Nadal one-dimensionally spams the Fed BH for errors. Again I disagreed and noted Rafa's transitional game.

Then you obtusely claimed that because Nadal can hit his FH 'easily' his strategy is nothing special. I argued using Fed as an example that the same can be said of everyone. Now you're claiming that Nadal cannot win without hitting to the Fed BH. I agree but I stress that, given everything I've said, its not that simple.

Of course tennis is about match-ups. I said earlier that Federer is better than Nadal against the rest of the field. It's funny how you started mentioning logical fallacies.

oh you're sooo right, nadals challenge is to hit to one side of the court for 4 hours, what a fucking genius, contender for GOAT no doubt, cos his FH is so intricately skillfully magnificent he deserves a medal for this achievement. go suck ya mother cock please. nadals a filthy cheat nothing more

Keep up your strawmen and personal attacks if they make you feel better.

nadals a stalling cheat. taking 2 hours to serve when he's down break point to rob his opponent of momentum and rhythm and you are also a poopy pants

ive heard retards try to hump things and nadal nails that sound spot on