Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC 1 - Super Slow Motion

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
14,158
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 15, 2009

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (femr2)

  • Notice it does not hit WTC 7 nor fall on top of it. At best small pieces scratched the facade. The smaller buildings the Tower fell on took the brunt and withstood it well considering. The street between WTC 7 and the main plaza was virtually void of WTC1 debris. FBI Release #22. Greyraven, 1/4 mile freefall 9.4 seconds in Manhattan. Both Towers fell in less than 11 seconds. 1 floor every 1/10 second. The core was plumb and uncrushed by the upper building. The cauliflower dust tells all

  • @IranContraScumDid911

    WTC 7 was hit by portions of WTC 1:

    watch?v=wjnJ7CPIoFA

    More than a scratch for sure:

    watch?v=FaoXMx4pSFE

    Primary crush front propogation time was about 14.5s:

    watch?v=_rI1MuooNm8

  • @femr2 I just might have more 9/11 videos than anybody on Youtube, The first link you sent me too from the west. The North Tower does not fall on WTC 7 and again pieces scratch down the facade. The eastern part that looks like it hit, is seen missing in other videos. Here is the deal that cannot be argued and confirms everything I say. There is barely any WTC 1 debris in the street in front of WTC 7. Notice in the first video the roofline is intact, untouched. 2nd link, later Roofline destroyed.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 Good for you. WTC7 wasn't hit with a huge amount of debris. It got a little more than scratched. But *believe* whatever you please. I'd imagine debris took out lower portion of column 20, which resulted in that damage propogating up to the roofline later on. Who knows eh. There's no video directly west showing clearly what scale of impacts ocurred, so it's all speculation.

  • Starting @ 0:40, top of shot, approx 1" down from top in center, creation of a spire starts. Then, all around in the smoke one can see flashes of light beond that spot. In that smoke, there should be nothing... the building is falling.

    Just focus on the spire top and you can see a direction to these flashes... then the steel column starts to smoke for no reason and falls away from thoes flashes.

    Just a casual obsevation.

    Excellent work on these shots and your core collapse series!

  • Watch this video to see the extent of smoke coverage at the point of the descent of WTC 1

    watch?v=KlvcWhgV8x0

Top Comments

  • massive explosion..great work by CDI

see all

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The exterior of the WTC was load bearing steel covered in concrete.

    You don't need to be any kind of expert to clearly see concrete bursting to dust from explosions.

    The wiring and explosive setting job on these buildings took years to complete.

    You would need full security access.

    Enter Marvin Bush, George W. Bush's little brother.

    As director of Securcom in charge of WTC security 93-00, Marvin Bush, had more than 7 years to oversee the largest controlled demolition in world history.

  • Doesn't look like any fire-collapse in recorded history. Explosives were obviously used. Thanks for the upload.

    peace

  • 0:26 look

  • No office fire - that's for sure.

  • Amazing footage! The 9/11 was just the beginning of what is to come soon.

  • ok notice at 0:34 on the left side of the tower is a wall a full wall free falling menaing the top of the tower pushed it out and away menaing the tower was not a demolition!

    also the debri is falling way out of the tower meaning if it was a controled demolition it would be a faliure because it would all fall inside and down this fell out and around also if you look around on the intrenet the whole back of wtc 7 is in flames!

  • perfect inside job. respect for the worker

  • @femr2 @femr2 You are making a point which is moot. Neither damage from falling debris nor fire caused the collapse of 7. How can I say this? Well conclusively the other buildings like 6 which withstood severe damage from debris remained standing. Any rational person knows and can calculate the impossibility of any steel frame structure falling due to fire. And the video eveidence alone is enough to prove that 7 was a controlled demolition. Not to metion the owner of the thing saying to pull it.

  • @MrSqueevoot sadly it is not conspiracy BS, it is a conspiracy theory with substantial evidence. govs LIE, and ours has a history of it (gulf of tonkin, USS liberty, op northwoods [but not done], gulf war one lies, etc.)

    we want to uncover the conspiracy FOR the victims, so they do not die in vain. also so their MURDER is not used as the criminals intended, for wars that have killed ~1million. iraq had nothing to do with terror, and i have travelled the ME and israel/palestine. PNAC/NEOCONS.

  • We see clearly that 9/11 was inside job ,,done by Mossad"s Terrorists no?¿

    israel is planning new 9/11s.....Gud Vid :)

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more