Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Chicago vs. Vancouver

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,296
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 23, 2006

I would have to say Vancouver owned Chicago on this one.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Author is a fag Chicago clearly owned vancover LOL how bais can you be to write what he wrote. You idiot an injured player and the second fight the vancover player got dropped twice. Only good hit they got was the cheap hit when the Chicago player was being restrained

  • what about this clip makes the author think the hawks got 'owned' at any point of this?

  • it was a clean hit but allen was off balence

  • that was a beautiful, clean hit by Lapointe!

  • It maybe clean but it was a cheapshot, Lapointe is a jerk. Of course Ruutu is in every little pile of pushing and shoving. Got to love Ruuts!

  • dude that was clean

  • ha. that wasnt dirty,...he didnt nail him..he shoved him, if you think tahts a bad hit, your a pussy, allen just embelished it. I mean...if he didnt like it, he shouldve got up right away and went with them...so...thats how you play hockey. Any lesser man plays other sports, real men, play real hockey

  • can you plaese explain to me how that was a dirty hit i am an idiot and know nothing about hockey

  • more what? gay hits or brawls?

  • NHL badly needs more of this.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more