Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Virginia Tech Massacre used to increase gun control

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,509
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 17, 2007

Lou Dobbs discusses gun control and the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because of the Virginia Tech shooter. Broadcast April 18, 2007.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nauglefest)

  • The attempt to disarm Americans, is for the New World Order?

  • Yes, why wouldn't it be? The founding fathers knew about what would happen if citizens were disarmed. This is why they wrote the 2nd amendment to the constitution. Even in countries like Russia who don't allow anyone to have a gun except for police and military have still experienced school shootings. Where do they get the guns? Leaders have always wanted an unarmed population, it makes the leaders and politicians feel safer when they can betray the people and not have consequences for it.

Top Comments

  • Gun contol does not mean crime control. You can never stop bad people from trying to bad things, the only hing you can do is prepare yourself. Fact: every gun control law has failed, Fact: right to carry states have lower crime rates than those who don't. Fact: England and Australia now have the highest violent crime rate in the world due to a complete gun ban, the U.S is tenth in overall violent crime. Fact: with guns we are citizens without them we are subjects.

  • If Cho was killed by a student with a concealed gun I guarnantee that kid would be praised as a hero especially if he took him out the second before he could kill another person.

see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There are places in the U.S. where everybody on the streets open carry and everyone is safer for it. Of course there are major cities like New York where if everybody regularly carried a gun it would be very dangerous. My point is it should be up to the people in that region and not the federal government.

  • Wasn't it a Gun Free Zone?

  • "All human situations have their inconveniences. We feel those of the present but neither see nor feel those of the future; and hence we often make troublesome changes without amendment, and frequently for the worse."

    Benjamin Franklin

  • The problem with a "Gun free WORLD", is that it would never happen. Not as long as humans continue to live anyway. Firearm's aren't the problem, its the people commit the crimes.

    The 2nd article of the Bill of Rights isn't necessarily for the current people in government. It's about whether that need should arise, whether it be in our lifetime or not.

  • The NRA is only good at one thing, that's negotiating away gun rights. People should be able to own any kind of firearm regardless of make or model according to the second article of the bill of rights.

  • How many of our schools have to be desecrated by blood and bullets before congress will act?

    How many of our schools have to be desecrated by blood and bullets before the dumbasses in charge realize gun control is endangering more lives?

  • Because we don't need no "gun free zone" We need a damn "Gun free WORLD"

  • Fuck all that conspiracy theory, you can't even look at you , damn why the american people are so blind and dumb ? Cmon man a gun to protect you ? against what ? An evil government ? Buy all tha gun you want , you will still buyin cocacola can's.... The real Conspiracy is here....

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more