Fallacy of ID and creationism-False Dichotomy [Reloaded]

This is a revised version of the previous one, with some additions and clarifications.

This video debunks all creationist and intelligent design claims against evolution citing a simple logic fallacy

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Logic
• fallacy
• false
• dichotomy
• dilemma
• creation
• intelligent
• design
• evolution

[Mogley52]

ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

[Mogley52]

SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

[Mogley52]

APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

[Mogley52]

NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

[Mogley52]

THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.

[amierdolo]

music please!!!!!

[pillowbugg]

Creationists turned this video off and instantly began speaking about how evolution is incorrect and creationism is ,thus, the only answer left. Hence, learning absolutely nothing (again) and using the same old refutted arguments to press their case againt evilution....On a serious note, I will point out why this issue is cardinal with christianity. Since evolution proves their holy book wrong at the initial stages, everything else is irrelevant. The christian religious ship is sinking.!!!

[ArcyTheFurryArcanine]

False Dichotomy is one fallacy, arguing from ignorance is another they commit 

[shaneho78]

"What actually happens is that once scientists get hold of a good concept they gradually refine and extend it with greater and greater subtlety as their instruments of measurement improve. Theories are not so much wrong as incomplete." Isaac Asimov (the Relativity of Wrong)

[ozredneck22]

"Jason is too stupid to build model airplanes"

We know the components of the airplane exist in nature, metals are in the ground, silica for glass are in sand, copper, rubber etc can occur naturally. We know the action of rain, wind, earthquakes, lightning etc "could" produce the airplane naturally, THEREFORE no intelligent design is required.

But we also know -

"Nature is too stupid to produce airplanes"

But Nature isn't the only stupid one.