How Much Time Should She Do?

John McCain wants to overturn Roe v. Wade. He wants to outlaw abortion. If abortion is illegal, anyone participating in an abortion - from the doctor to the woman, has one will be a criminal. We have questions, John McCain, what should her punishment be? How much time should she do?

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• pro-choice
• pro-life
• criminalization
• McCain
• abortion
• Political
• Commercial
• Commentary
• and
• Analysis

[SuperHappyPuppy]

@countrymusicfan427 Of course you cause the deaths of animals for your own pleasure if you're a meat-eater. You don't have to eat meat. You choose to. You could sustain yourself solely on plant foods if you wished. So why don't you?

[countrymusicfan427]

@SuperHappyPuppy

I do not kill cows or chickens for my own pleasure??Would you rather eat your best friend or a cow if you were starving?Maybe you're a brave soul and would choose death...good for you,but I'm eating the cow!I am human,I respect human life more than animals,but I love animals and I sure as heck don't eat them for fun!An embryo is the start of that baby one day being born.If you end the process of creating life before it is done of course it won't be "ready" to live on its own.

[Spillers72]

I think the Ad is incorrect.From what I have read it would be more like 3 states. One also has to remember that if a state has a health exception this includes mental health which means abortion remains defacto legal. Also, most states seeking to ban abortion only criminalize it for doctors not women having abortions. I'm prolife and seek to reduce abortion but don't favor criminalizing it. The unborn child has a right to life but that can't compel a woman to provide her body as lifesupport

[leiapeison]

@bobbybrady8 im not trying to kill people with no friends. what i am saying is that adoption isnt a panancea. if it was abortion wouldnt exist. each pregnancy outcome has different consequences and only the woman in this particular situation has a right to decide.

[SuperHappyPuppy]

Yeah, it's about the right to kill! You have the right to kill cows and chickens for your own pleasure. And I have the right to kill embryos that reside in my body, for my convenience. Deal with it.

[bobbybrady8]

@SuperHappyPuppy

If your argument is not about when life begins then your arugement must be about THE RIGHT TO KILL. Science clearly tells us when life begins. I like the way you call me names. It makes me know that you see the truth and have to resort to calling names.

[SuperHappyPuppy]

What does MATH have to do with this? Shriek away, you impotent loser.

[bobbybrady8]

@SuperHappyPuppy

So you dont believe Science? Do you not believe math? Science does not matter? So if you do not care about science or what it says about human life, what exactly do you care about? Just the right to kill? If it is not an arguement about when life begins then it is an arguement about rights to kill. Please help me understand your view.

[SuperHappyPuppy]

Well, quite frankly, what you believe doesn't actually matter. Women have the right to abortion, and there's nothing you can do about it but shriek in rage.

[bobbybrady8]

@SuperHappyPuppy

There is a difference between stages in LIFE. Zygote, ebrybo, fetus, newborn, toddler, child, tween, teen, young adult, adult, senior citizen. What do all of these have in common? They are ALL HUMAN BEINGS. Every Senior Citizen on earth today had to go through each and every change that is listed. Life has a begining and an end. Science Tells us this oh and if you are Religious God, the Creator of Science, told us this long ago.