This is a talk I will be presenting at the 2007 April APS Meeting in Jacksonville, Florida. My GEM (gravity and EM) proposal is the spot between Newton's scalar gravity theory and Einstein's rank ...
This is a talk I will be presenting at the 2007 April APS Meeting in Jacksonville, Florida. My GEM (gravity and EM) proposal is the spot between Newton's scalar gravity theory and Einstein's rank 2 field equations.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
you had a great sense of imagination + u'r skills in math = wallah. i can pic. this craft of your's like static scalar potential, does this involve curving space time since the transverse wave is light?
hypothetically, is the higgs referred to as the tachyon? according to sir hawkins he bet 101% they wouldn't find the higgs, my point of view to say the least is that they might discover other exotic particles and produced anti matter for that ambitious project nd it's worth it.
im still stickin to your proposal thou, how bout considering the medium aether...
The Higgs is never referred to as a tachyon. The standard model works for particles with no mass which is a problem, since the particles do have mass. Prof. Higgs provided a way using a false vacuum to give mass to particles in the standard model without breaking it.
My proposal suggests that if gravity is unified with the other forces correctly, there is no need for the Higgs mechanism. There still is no need for the aether, the math is prettier than that :-)
I have a diferent theory for SM interactions and the gravity, the group of S.M. in two dimencions(in my theory) is similar to Electroweak Model(but the electromagnetism is a scalar field).
The E and B fields cannot be viewed as a scalar field, they just don't behave like scalars. Look at an EM field from a moving reference frame, and the way all the E's and B's mix together is quite confusing but well documented. EM is the result of an anti-symmetric rank 2 tensor field, not a scalar field (you would need 6 scalar fields too, one for Ex, Ey, Ez, Bx, By, and Bz, arg!).
Excellent points: one needs to understand how the weak and strong forces could integrate with gravity and EM. At the time I did this talk, I had no idea. With the development of analytic animations using quaternions, I have some idea, but not enough to do calculations. Search for "standard model" to get a gist (and yes, I recognize it is incomplete).
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
i can pic. this craft of your's like static scalar potential, does this involve curving space time since the transverse wave is light?
im still stickin to your proposal thou, how bout considering the medium aether...
My proposal suggests that if gravity is unified with the other forces correctly, there is no need for the Higgs mechanism. There still is no need for the aether, the math is prettier than that :-)
Good luck in your studies.
And the QFD?
And the Electroweac Model?
this theory is very very complete...
Thanks for uploading! 5 stars a favorite AND a new sub!