Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Geometry + 4-Potentials = Unified Field Theory

This is a talk I will be presenting at the 2007 April APS Meeting in Jacksonville, Florida. My GEM (gravity and EM) proposal is the spot between Newton's scalar gravity theory and Einstein's rank ...  
 
Customize

More From: sweetser

Loading...

QuickList(0)

10 ratings
Sign in to rate
6,107 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (9)   Options

Loading...
pLaSmAGrEEn (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
omg plug ur mic all the way in next time
engkngorks (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you had a great sense of imagination + u'r skills in math = wallah.
i can pic. this craft of your's like static scalar potential, does this involve curving space time since the transverse wave is light?
engkngorks (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
hypothetically, is the higgs referred to as the tachyon? according to sir hawkins he bet 101% they wouldn't find the higgs, my point of view to say the least is that they might discover other exotic particles and produced anti matter for that ambitious project nd it's worth it.

im still stickin to your proposal thou, how bout considering the medium aether...
sweetser (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
The Higgs is never referred to as a tachyon. The standard model works for particles with no mass which is a problem, since the particles do have mass. Prof. Higgs provided a way using a false vacuum to give mass to particles in the standard model without breaking it.

My proposal suggests that if gravity is unified with the other forces correctly, there is no need for the Higgs mechanism. There still is no need for the aether, the math is prettier than that :-)
Ulises2357 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I have a diferent theory for SM interactions and the gravity, the group of S.M. in two dimencions(in my theory) is similar to Electroweak Model(but the electromagnetism is a scalar field).
sweetser (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
The E and B fields cannot be viewed as a scalar field, they just don't behave like scalars. Look at an EM field from a moving reference frame, and the way all the E's and B's mix together is quite confusing but well documented. EM is the result of an anti-symmetric rank 2 tensor field, not a scalar field (you would need 6 scalar fields too, one for Ex, Ey, Ez, Bx, By, and Bz, arg!).

Good luck in your studies.
Ulises2357 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
And the QCD?
And the QFD?
And the Electroweac Model?
this theory is very very complete...
sweetser (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Excellent points: one needs to understand how the weak and strong forces could integrate with gravity and EM. At the time I did this talk, I had no idea. With the development of analytic animations using quaternions, I have some idea, but not enough to do calculations. Search for "standard model" to get a gist (and yes, I recognize it is incomplete).
nicolaiculus (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Great, finally a theory that does not need the Higgs, but what happens if the Higgs is discovered?
twothlesswonder (2 years ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Damn! I live in Jax and I would have loved to have gone to see your presentation. Well, at least I have this video to view.

Thanks for uploading! 5 stars a favorite AND a new sub!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.