Moonfaker: Radioactive Anomaly II. PART 1

A lot has happened since the release of my 23-part "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly" series. A few months ago I asked the propagandists 32 questions regarding Apollo. It looks as though Astrobrant2 has dodged his way through them.

More recently, Phil Webb has produced a two part response to a brief passing mention in "Exhibit D" about how the Soviets warned Sir Bernard Lovell that they "could see no way of protecting cosmonauts from the lethal effects of solar radiation".
In summery: Webb claims that the Soviets never went to the moon, not because of deadly radiation, but because they couldn't get the N-1 moon rocket to work. But by focusing only on the failed N-1, he ignores the Zond & Energia programs. Both of which were proven technology, the former of which was considered flight worthy and could have flown two cosmonauts around the moon as early as December 1968. If you build it, and test it, why not use it? The Soviets obviously had bigger programs to worry about than the N-1, like say, radiation.

Meanwhile, a certain Wikipedia vandal has tried to muddy the waters as to whether or not there were any major solar flares during the Apollo missions and as to whether or not the minor ones can hurt you. He has also demanded specific calculations for the attenuation of the Van Allen belt electrons.

As my Christmas present to all within the Apollo moon landing hoax movement, I present to you my follow-up to "MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly".

In Parts 1-2 and 4, we will be going through the radiation-related questions that Astrobrant2 answered. Or more accurately dodged.

In Part 3 will will be debunking the Wikipedia Vandals's misconceptions of solar flares, the Van Allen belts, and the shielding offered by the CSM.

In Part 4-7, we will see that, contrary to what Webb claims, the Soviets indeed knew the cislunar radiation would kill their cosmonuts. They had bigger things to worry about than whether or not the N-1 could work. Other tangents Webb goes on include why didn't the Soviets fake their own moon project and the wheat deals.

Finally in Parts 8-9, I will be making some revisions, corrections and further clarifications to some statements I made in my first radiation series. These regard the South Atlantic Anomaly and camera film.

MoonFaker: What Proof Is Required?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GLKLb0DNyY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pekpmUbwyv4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK67QOwXQpU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI0wwVzNwxc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8k1ot_OAk0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5ius21NwzI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVN2VCsrcik

MoonFaker: Why Not Go Back?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_Ka14URW5w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3Joz6vnpsg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_X6W5WH_Dk

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moonfaker
• radioactive
• anomaly
• II
• james
• van
• allen
• radiation
• belts
• bremsstrahlung
• calculations
• f=kZE
• 7-8g/cm^2
• Astronautical
• engineering
• and
• science
• 32
• questions
• for
• propagandists
• solar
• flare
• cosmic
• ray
• proton
• electron
• volts
• protons
• electrons
• x-ray
• x-rays
• MeV
• astronauts
• moon
• hoax
• conspiracy
• theory
• fake
• Soviet
• Union
• USSR
• Sir
• Bernard
• Lovell
• John
• Mauldin
• M.V.
• Keldysh
• E.E.
• Kovalev
• Jarrah
• White
• JW
• Studios

[mujaku]

On going to Mars, as a way to overcome radiation problems, turtles will be trained as astronauts. Turtles can take a dose as high as 15,000rad to 60,000rad whereas human can only take 500rad.

[LunarTuner]

Nice to meet you, Nick. Here's a short list of astronomers & astrophysicists (some Nobel Laureates) who believe that JW is wrong: Steven Hawking, Phil Plait, G.R. Caruthers, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Robert Wilson, Arno Penzias, Subramanyan Chandrasekhar, Tadashi Nakajima, James Christy, Joseph Taylor and Dr. James Van Allen, himself who said: "The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense."

[nckey42]

@LunarTuner The most reliable minds? Please name some of these minds, and what they have done in their life that makes them reliable... You can't... Your words mean nothing... You are an ugly fuck, who probably still jerks off once a day..

[LunarTuner]

@yesiamawizardjonny, you're quite welcome. I appreciate truly open, inquiring minds. I have no fear that someone like you--who is truly looking at all sides of an idea--will conclude what the most reliable minds around the world have concluded: man can leave earth's magnetosphere for a few days without "frying".

Let Mr. White know.

[yesiamawizardjonny]

@LunarTuner LunarTuner, you proved that man went past the VABs for me. Thank you for that.

[TheGrotesqueReality]

You are a superhero, and your powers being intelligence (lots of it) and a noble craving for the truth.

[nekotech]

"I know many of us would like to respond" Looks like you found the time, twice.

"One thing certain: JW believes" Interesting. I see JW asking questions more than preaching beliefs.

"His empire stands or falls on that." Is that what you want. For it to be the "one big thing"? Maybe there are a lot of little things. Although when JW proved that there were indeed solar "events" during every supposed Apollo moon mission, by using US govt documents, that was indeed a "big one".

[LunarTuner]

I know many of us would like to respond to this massive 2 part series, but first we need to quit our jobs, get a divorce and then convince ourselves that this is more gripping than War and Peace.

One thing certain: JW believes that everything hinges on the scientific certainty that the Van Allen Belts and life outside of them is necessarily, as a matter of course, absolutely lethal at all times, without massive lead insulation. His empire stands or falls on that. Good luck, JW. You'll need it.

[LunarTuner]

Mr. White, 2 more hours on this topic? Seriously? A title like "Moonfaker: Radioactive Anomaly II. PART 1"? Doesn't that tell you that you're getting away from the basics and chasing a bit too many rabbits? For gosh sakes, can you have mercy on your fellow hoax theorists and Apollo believers alike? Please, please, we beg you to learn brevity! Please sharpen your communication techniques so we can actually understand! You are going to lose your entire audience! Don't shoot yourself in the foot!!!

[DeBunx]

23 videos on radiation??

For those of us who don't feel like listening to you for over three and a half hours, could you just make a bare bones single video? All it needs to do is cite a couple of modern peer reviewed papers which give radiation figures of the belts and why astronauts would not survive skirting their edge for an hour. I found diagrams in wikipedia. Would that be helpful.

Then give the data for what shielding would be required, again, based on scientific evidence. Quantify.