original turks were just like aryans - this is getting proven now. Azeris retained their european race (diluted by pre-semitic lineages) unlike other turks who mixed too much with mongols. The new finding is that aryans and turks were identical race tens thousand years ago up until 16000 ago when they reached mongols in the east! The western turks remained "aryan" looking until scythian times, however due to settling in this region mixed with locals, loosing that original look.
Azeris r closer genetically to ALL neighbours - the Caucasus, Turkey, iran. The Azeris in Iran may be closer to persians due to of geography than northern Azeris. Pls understand me - the whole region is one - including Turkey, fertile crescent and Iran, but Persians have many more additional admixtures than Azeris, Georgians, Lezgis for example, and that is what makes us NOT identical, only "close". The original aryans were slavic. Persians r not aryans by blood only the language is.
like for expressions or getting mad or hand gestures, etc. its the same, this means that the thinking is similar, which means that our culture is more similar, in comparisson to the average English/British persons, who are the majority of N. Americans. but the E'ireann/Irish are the best, they are legit, the closest ones to us, almost all my friends or even nice strangers that i know are E'ireann. and our closeness is to Azeris the most!
... like this girl i know in me school, who's Irish and has white skin, and red-hair, (W. EUROPEAN) but other than having red-hair and being like 30yrs older, our family friend has all the same features, and almost identicle voice, which is fuckin amazing cause of age difference, the only difference between finding whos voice is whos, is if one spoke English or Farsi! another more even amazing thing is that they both fuckin ACt/behave the same way!!!! it is extraoridinary!...
Mongols settled in Anatolia and formed Turkey, thats why you guys are fucking related, speak same language root, look the same (but with more European features, since they mixed with you) and have the same culture. and most Azeris look Erani, im Azeri, most of our friends are ethnically Azeri but we resemble more Erani traites than Eranians of Eran, since we are the more original Eranis who mixed with Turks rathre than Arabs. our family friend is Azeri, but she looks like..
... to try to debunk, but you keep ignoring it, please do it by proof.and Saga/Scythians were originally Eranic people, and yes they were there BEFORE Persians since Persia was an Empire later, Saga were Eranians tribes along the Cimmerians and Sarmatis who were all related. but 8000yrs ago, please provide evidence, because at that time those were Uiguyrs not Saga. and TURKS = MONGOLS, almost 90% of Turks even say that. your repeating yourself now. and you mean E. European NOT W.!
.. Africa like the Uighyrs who migrated all the way the Finland like 10, 000 yrs ago. don't forget, Persians Medes, and Parthians were Eranic peoples or Airiyans, if you look at drawings of them, you'de see they all resembled Airiyan features, NOT Arabic/Semetic ones. and Elamites were Semites. oh my god, did you like not read anything i said before?! Azeri's aren't trying to be Eranisized, theyre being heavely Turkized, they are Eranians as ive provided points for you to try...
... those were Elamites, the term and name and people/race of Eran and Eranian came after the Airiyans invaded Eran or more correctly the Elams, once they did they refered to the land as "Eran" meaning "Land of Airiyans" literally, and Eranians or "Eran-e" as an Airiyan since it means "of the land of Airiyans". anyways, the Turkic peoples at those prehistoric times may have existed on those lands alongside those Semites, for they were most likely the same peoples who came out of ..
have 30-80% W. EUROPEAN origin? that would mean that they look like fuckin Germans/Vikings, 80%! i would love to see the proof of that, 80%, never heard of it, wtf?! seriously where did you get that idea of Slavs being the only Airiyans?! where in fact they aren't a 100% Airiyan, since they mixed with Turks. if you want to know who went toEran first, then note that Elamite and other SEMITES, existed 1st in Eran, however it was NOT called "Eran" at the time. those were NOT Eranians
.. proving this by a Doctor? they have even proven that King Arthur and the knights of the round table were ethnically Eranians -> Sarmatians. i've already stated points of Azeris being Erani, now if you want to dispute me, try to debunk those points, factually. What?! Kyrgyz and Kazakhs aren't Turk?! they are Turkic peoples, Turks are originally Mongols, thats a fact, but they've been mixed with Airiyans like Europeans and Eranians. and weres that stat from? Turkmen...
original turks were just like aryans - this is getting proven now. Azeris retained their european race (diluted by pre-semitic lineages) unlike other turks who mixed too much with mongols. The new finding is that aryans and turks were identical race tens thousand years ago up until 16000 ago when they reached mongols in the east! The western turks remained "aryan" looking until scythian times, however due to settling in this region mixed with locals, loosing that original look.
Shekimarali 5 days ago
Azeris r closer genetically to ALL neighbours - the Caucasus, Turkey, iran. The Azeris in Iran may be closer to persians due to of geography than northern Azeris. Pls understand me - the whole region is one - including Turkey, fertile crescent and Iran, but Persians have many more additional admixtures than Azeris, Georgians, Lezgis for example, and that is what makes us NOT identical, only "close". The original aryans were slavic. Persians r not aryans by blood only the language is.
Shekimarali 5 days ago
@Shekimarali
like for expressions or getting mad or hand gestures, etc. its the same, this means that the thinking is similar, which means that our culture is more similar, in comparisson to the average English/British persons, who are the majority of N. Americans. but the E'ireann/Irish are the best, they are legit, the closest ones to us, almost all my friends or even nice strangers that i know are E'ireann. and our closeness is to Azeris the most!
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
... like this girl i know in me school, who's Irish and has white skin, and red-hair, (W. EUROPEAN) but other than having red-hair and being like 30yrs older, our family friend has all the same features, and almost identicle voice, which is fuckin amazing cause of age difference, the only difference between finding whos voice is whos, is if one spoke English or Farsi! another more even amazing thing is that they both fuckin ACt/behave the same way!!!! it is extraoridinary!...
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
Mongols settled in Anatolia and formed Turkey, thats why you guys are fucking related, speak same language root, look the same (but with more European features, since they mixed with you) and have the same culture. and most Azeris look Erani, im Azeri, most of our friends are ethnically Azeri but we resemble more Erani traites than Eranians of Eran, since we are the more original Eranis who mixed with Turks rathre than Arabs. our family friend is Azeri, but she looks like..
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
... to try to debunk, but you keep ignoring it, please do it by proof.and Saga/Scythians were originally Eranic people, and yes they were there BEFORE Persians since Persia was an Empire later, Saga were Eranians tribes along the Cimmerians and Sarmatis who were all related. but 8000yrs ago, please provide evidence, because at that time those were Uiguyrs not Saga. and TURKS = MONGOLS, almost 90% of Turks even say that. your repeating yourself now. and you mean E. European NOT W.!
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
.. Africa like the Uighyrs who migrated all the way the Finland like 10, 000 yrs ago. don't forget, Persians Medes, and Parthians were Eranic peoples or Airiyans, if you look at drawings of them, you'de see they all resembled Airiyan features, NOT Arabic/Semetic ones. and Elamites were Semites. oh my god, did you like not read anything i said before?! Azeri's aren't trying to be Eranisized, theyre being heavely Turkized, they are Eranians as ive provided points for you to try...
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
... those were Elamites, the term and name and people/race of Eran and Eranian came after the Airiyans invaded Eran or more correctly the Elams, once they did they refered to the land as "Eran" meaning "Land of Airiyans" literally, and Eranians or "Eran-e" as an Airiyan since it means "of the land of Airiyans". anyways, the Turkic peoples at those prehistoric times may have existed on those lands alongside those Semites, for they were most likely the same peoples who came out of ..
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
have 30-80% W. EUROPEAN origin? that would mean that they look like fuckin Germans/Vikings, 80%! i would love to see the proof of that, 80%, never heard of it, wtf?! seriously where did you get that idea of Slavs being the only Airiyans?! where in fact they aren't a 100% Airiyan, since they mixed with Turks. if you want to know who went toEran first, then note that Elamite and other SEMITES, existed 1st in Eran, however it was NOT called "Eran" at the time. those were NOT Eranians
yashil17 6 days ago
@Shekimarali
.. proving this by a Doctor? they have even proven that King Arthur and the knights of the round table were ethnically Eranians -> Sarmatians. i've already stated points of Azeris being Erani, now if you want to dispute me, try to debunk those points, factually. What?! Kyrgyz and Kazakhs aren't Turk?! they are Turkic peoples, Turks are originally Mongols, thats a fact, but they've been mixed with Airiyans like Europeans and Eranians. and weres that stat from? Turkmen...
yashil17 6 days ago