YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

How an atomic clock works, and its use in the global positioning system (GPS)

engineerguyvideo engineerguyvideo·36 videos
97,858
166,878
Like     Dislike 25

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like engineerguyvideo's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike engineerguyvideo's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add engineerguyvideo's video to your playlist.

Published on Jun 12, 2012

Bill shows the world's smallest atomic clock and then describes how the first one made in the 1950s worked. He describes in detail the use of cesium vapor to create a feedback or control loop to control a quartz oscillator. He highlights the importance of atomic team by describing briefly how a GPS receiver uses four satellites to find its position. You can learn more about atomic clocks and the GPS system in the EngineerGuy team's new book Eight Amazing Engineering Stories http://www.engineerguy.com/elements

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (engineerguyvideo)

  • Steve55599

    This is a good introduction to atomic clocks, but it fails to clearly point out that it's not just the quartz that vibrates or resonates at a certain frequency. The cesium atom has it's own resonance frequency (9,192,631,770 cycles per second. This is actually THE definition of a second). When a cesium atom receives microwave energy at exactly this frequency, it changes its energy state. "A cesium atom always resonates at the same known frequency -- that is what makes atomic clocks so precise."

    · 7

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Steve55599's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Steve55599's comment.
  • engineerguyvideo

    The 9,192,631,770 cycles per second gives the impression that it is a cesium atom vibrating. Remember that number is the ENERGY gap between the two lowest energy levels of cesium. (E=h*nu, where h is planck's constant and nu is the frequency; we report it instead in joules or wavenumbers ... I used to be a spectroscopist!) So, it is not correct to think of cesium vibrating like a pendulum. What gives a clock the great accuracy is that this energy gap is the same for every atom. (cont -->)

    · 53

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate engineerguyvideo's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate engineerguyvideo's comment.
    in reply to Steve55599 (Show the comment)
  • engineerguyvideo

    (cont) in fact Cesium was chosen because its lower energy states aren't "messy" (i.e., a number of transitions) and it can be easily prepare as a gas. I recommend Essen's early paper on it from the1950s.

    · 51

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate engineerguyvideo's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate engineerguyvideo's comment.
    in reply to engineerguyvideo (Show the comment)

All Comments (418)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • bembry3000

    I'll start with Jell-O

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bembry3000's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bembry3000's comment.
  • Matthew Burt

    @vinchanzo espionage: its like triangulation. If you know the position of x and y you can calculate the position of z.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Matthew Burt's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Matthew Burt's comment.
  • Jeroen Peeters

    For regular use, you are standing upon the earth, which is a sphere itself. Only when you are up in the air the fourth one really matters. Well that is how I think it works

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jeroen Peeters's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jeroen Peeters's comment.
    in reply to Daniel Walsh (Show the comment)
  • chriscon22

    Yes and it has to be corrected every so slightly for relativity.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate chriscon22's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate chriscon22's comment.
    in reply to artr0x93 (Show the comment)
  • Daniel Walsh

    Why are three satellites sufficient beyond the fourth time-keeping one? As you say, the first two narrow the position down to a circle. But the third will narrow the position down to the intersection of this circle with a sphere, which is actually two points, not one.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Daniel Walsh's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Daniel Walsh's comment.
  • kazamatsri

    If the oscillations essentially never decay...where does the decay come from if we keep jolting the quartz?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kazamatsri's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate kazamatsri's comment.
  • Vladimir Zharkov

    Those tricky bitches, thats brilliant.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vladimir Zharkov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vladimir Zharkov's comment.
  • Ritt Momney

    never stop making these

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ritt Momney's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ritt Momney's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later