Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
he should marry Attack of the Show's, Olivia Munn !
-
lmao!!
-
Now that was funny!!!
-
If this was a video of white non-jewish people telling a friend not to marry a non-white there would be uproar and this would never have aired on ABC.
-
who fuckin cares?
Oh, you do.. :/
i hope it gets you somewhere meaningful in life..
-
THAT IS NOT RABBI GRONER. Rabbi Groner passed mid 2008. John Safran is a nasty unit doing this.
-
that's true, but his circle of friends and spiritual advisors have been trying to shame him away from intermarriage. his friend, for instance, said he would sever his ties to john if he married a shiksha. it's almost as if his community has given john an ultimatum: "marry a jew, or forsake your kind and face castigation." What I love about Judaism is the emphasis placed on choice and free will.... ....
-
The fact is, is that we can choose who we are if we recognize our own innate ability to change - to become more than our original cultural and religious backgrounds. Take for instance a person who grew up a catholic who now embraces secularism. This person simply has said no to their natural programming, while John continues to waffle between self-delusion , self-destruction and sexual distortion. Just because he feels attracted to Eurasion women doesn't mean he needs to surrender his culture.
-
John Safran marry someone. LOL! His South American girlfriend Loreena left him because of his immaturity and ineptitude, and he has gone through quite a number of airhead, bimbo girlfriends . The problem with John is not only his immaturity, but his self-absorbed narcissism. John only cares about John and no one else. Also, he has not had a stable, long term relationship since Loreena. John will need to someday actually make it big and earn serious money if he wants to settle down with a wife.
just marry your Eurasian john and fuck what everyone thinks.
markyaz68 2 years ago 7
Why does it require faith to be an atheist? An atheist simply don't accept the unproved claimed that there is a god. It's like not accepting a claim that unicorns exist until they can prove it, that would be an aunicornist. We don't have to prove a negative, it's impossible to prove non-existense of something that has never been proven to exist in the first place. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim of existence.
allinsman 2 years ago 5