Newt Gingrich wins South Carolina Republican primary

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has trounced front-runner Mitt Romney in the South Carolina primary. Report by Sophie Foster. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/itn and follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/itn

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Newt Gingrich
• Mitt Romney
• South Carolina primary
• nomination
• Ron Paul
• Rick Santorum
• Florida
• White House
• Barack Obama

[concernedagain]

The best is Ron Paul, so he wont win and this newt fella wont win either, Obama will be back, no doubt bout it. American elections are very predictable.

[cowboyshooter1]

SIc'em Newt 2012!!!!

[shootnmove]

NEWT LIKES WILD SEX, 3SOMES, NOT PAYING TAXES ... AND DIVORCE

Ron paul delivered babies for free instead of taking tax dollars from medicaid

GOOD JOB S.C.

[shootnmove]

AND THE VERDICT IS IN ....

South Carolina is still full of ignorant rednecks who dont know how to vote

R.P. 4 PRES

[XChineseNewYearX]

Wonder why so many dislikes... Ron Paul's 14 year old's at it again.

[dclaver2]

South Carolina is ranked last in Education in the USA.

[Patriotman1990]

Newt?? 0_o WHAT THE HECK SC??

[tarantinoisahack]

@Kukainis Libertarianism sounds a damn lot like Communism; wonderful in theory but not all that great in practice. Like communism, you rely far too much on the good nature of people. You think that people can be completely free of coercion and not act selfishly, driven by short-term aims.

If the Egyptians vote in the Islamists then it's bad for everybody. It'll hurt tourism and make the region more radical. The dictators were bad but what is come will be worse than the dictators.

[tarantinoisahack]

@Kukainis But this is the free market, if they are doing what they want without government interference. They did it so that they could make money, how do free market libertarians plan on fighting that?

[Kukainis]

@tarantinoisahack

Somalia doesn't have a free market economy. That is the libertarian way, not the no government part. Government is just an obstacle you remove along the way...

And regarding Egypt, if the people willingly elect an Islamic force in power, then obviously they are not ready for a secular society and it would be wrong to impose one on them against their will.

[Kukainis]

@tarantinoisahack

so that there is no one to bribe, while libertarians want to increase the size of the government. All itdoes is create more bureaucracy (which costs even more money for tax payers in form of taxes or inflation) but the banks can still own the government. They can still bribe politicians and get them to do what they want...



[Kukainis]

@tarantinoisahack

Yes, banks own the government, you pointed that out very well. And because people who run the banks are greedy bastards (that's just the nature of man, you can't change that) they will eventually bribe any kind of government body to get what they want, be it softer regulatory terms or legislation (like SOPA for example). The difference between libertarians and liberals in general is the that libertarians want to kill the cause of the corruption.