Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Milton Friedman on America's Drug Forum pt.1of3

Reagan's economist, Nobel Laureate, speaks out on the immorality and bad economics of the War on Drugs and its history (Alcohol Prohibition).  
 
Customize

More From: ichisatori

Loading...

QuickList(0)

This is a video response to Tour Of A Marijuana Growhouse
104 ratings
Sign in to rate
13,522 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (28)   Options

Loading...
cpblackangel88 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Drugs are a personal choice. So they should be legal. Also we spend billions as a nation to fight the gangs and mobsters in them. Than we make drugs illegal so we can give criminals a market for them to make money selling drugs illegally. Legalize gambling,drugs, and prostitution. Make it so they have no more businesses besides murder which wont be nearly enough to fund there current enterprise.
SHBBKBB (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
on the other hand, even if there was no law against alcohol use in children, you, as a parent would do your best that your child does not use it. you don't need the state to tell you what's good for your child.
SHBBKBB (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
your children have a right to eat candy whenever they want - does that mean that you have to let them do that?
all028 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I don't think you should equate drugs with candy
SHBBKBB (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you are free to think whatever you want but I am talking about a principle, and that is - children are not adults and it is nonsense to argue that something should be illegal for everyone because you would not want your children to use it. for example, the fact that an adult can drink alcohol does not imply that a child can do the same.
all028 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well, you are going against Milton's principles...no gov't intervention. It's the parents responsiblility not the gov't
cpblackangel88 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Well parents should be the ones to tell if there kids to drink or not. Unless there intentionally harming them. I don't think government can question it.
pdynamics1 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ok, Let's say a kid is caught doing drugs but the parent gave them permission to do so. Should the parents be put in jail?
amirgiles (5 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Depends on the drug and the age of the child I guess. Shooting up a three year old with heroin is not the same as letting your 17 year old have a glass of wine or a puff of weed. Would you put parents who smoke around their children in jail? As soon as kids are involved it gets much more complicated, but the general principle of leaving adults to make their own choices about their own health makes sense to me.
pdynamics1 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes, I would put them in jail. The other thing is where is the line to be drawn? Some would say 10, others would say 18. Hell, why not 5????

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.