Age of Stupid: Trailers: USA

No description available.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• age
• of
• stupid
• trailer
• usa
• franny
• armstrong
• pete
• postlethwaite

[saxmanchiro]

@captaincrash12 Again, I reiterate. It doesn't matter what you or I opine. The science is clear. AGW is real and it is continuing unabated. The carbon dioxide that we have released into the atmosphere already, is enough (390ppm-NOAA,2010) to give us catastrophic climate changes in the near future. The quote is just one sentence from a 6 page statement from one of the most prestigious groups of climatologists on the planet. I tend to listen to scientists, not obfuscational buffoons.

[captaincrash12]

@saxmanchiro I do not believe the governments are truly helping. Governments or organisations apart, there are individuals in organisations taking advantage of this and us. Governments appear to help to gain your vote. A terrrible cycle. Your care for our planet supporting this has failed you. We all can pill quotes from either side, yet I trust in what I see and read. Not in what these organisations feed you.

[saxmanchiro]

@captaincrash12 The good thing about this situation, is that your opinion is meaningless. As long as global governments act upon this, we can at least say we tried to help. From the American Meteorological Society, a member of the International MS, from their Feb 07 statement;

"...There is adequate evidence from observation and interpretation of climate simulation to conclude that the atmosphere, ocean and land surface are warming; that humans have significantly contributed to this change."

[MottTheWot]

The planet is just fine, these people are not!

[Climpacman1]

A lot of people do think it is fake. But most SCIENTISTS think it is happening, and maybe we should listen instead of living in denial.

[lordoftheinternets]

You are delusional and naive. There are just as many, if not thousands more, that disagree with the theory of AGW. But you can keep believing in fairytales if you want. Some grown-ups even believe in Santa Claus, they are usually mentally deficient though.

To me it seems more like you've invested yourself and your identity so much into this AGW hockus pockus that you are unable to even concider other possibilities because that would shatter your entire world view.

[saxmanchiro]

lordof

It's a good thing that the world's leaders don't listen to folks like you. The consensus is not just IPCC scientists. Those are just a panel of top experts. Thousands of others are in the wings of science doing their daily work to bring us the science that we rely on to know the truth. You can deny it all day long. It wouldn't matter. Good thing that.

[lordoftheinternets]

There's no 95% consensus. The IPCC consists of roughly 3000 scientists. According to several NASA studies the oceans have been cooling since 2003. This year we've had record cold temperatures throughout the entire world.

This whole global warming circus is distracting us from dealing with legitimate environmental concerns and it's only making things worse. Let's not be fighting those windmills Don Quijote.

[duffeknol]

There are no absolute truths in science, you should know this. And since the debate is still on, I simply listened to the (for me) more convincing arguments and sided with the sceptics. I honestly don't understand how siding with one side using SCIENTIFIC arguments makes me a sceptic of science... I did university for a reason, you know.

Check out the videos 'Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?' parts 1 - 4 for example, perfectly valid scientific arguments there. Not even conspiracy theories.

[duffeknol]

Woah woah woah there buddy. I am not a sceptic of science as a whole nor do I even believe in God. I compared our favourite videos and subsciptions (you know, a little research) and we're not so different. We both like Thunderf00t for example. Your problem is that you are a TOO big a fan of science. I don't have a problem with accepting science as the answer to everything, but do note that the answers they usually come up with HAVE to be debunked eventually in order for it to still be science.