John Armstrong on Harvey and Lee at COPA 2009

John Armstrong, author of 'Harvey and Lee', discusses the two Oswald theory at the regional meeting of the Coalition on Political Assassinations on November 21st 2009.

Visit http://www.politicalassassinations.com for more details

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• john armstrong
• harvey and lee
• jfk assassination
• lee harvey oswald
• copa
• dallas 2009

[TakeBackAmerica2012]

@brnahern7 The book was sent to me by a friend who owned a conspiracy website, who sadly passed away in 2010.

[TakeBackAmerica2012]

@brnahern7 Check with sources like JFK Lancer and pro-conspiracy websites. Amazon is too controlled by government forces, they don't want you to read this book. I have read the book but no longer have it. Conclusive proof that the Oswald in Russia is a different man than the Oswald in Dallas. If you look at photos of Oswald put out by different sources, you can clearly see it is not the same man in all the photos.

[brnahern7]

Where did people buy this book?? I cant seem to come across it anywhere?Amazon are constantly out of stock and are claiming the book costs upwards of $200.Is this right?

[JesseJamesGang1]

Slowly making my way through this brilliant book. Thank you so much for all of your hard work on the case!

[hayesman76]

I have read John Armstrong's utterly intriguing book "Harve and Lee" twice. Of the dozens and dozens of books about the JFK assassination which I have read this one is a real standout for the sheer volume of ORIGINAL RESEARCH AND FINDINGS it contains. John Armstrong is, in my view, one of the USA's greatest patriots. This man basically took a multi-year hiatus from his business and personally financed his own original investigation of the case.

[beaviselectron]

Take the time and trouble to read this 1,000-page book. Yes, it's dry and sometimes tedious. But the facts come from hundreds (thousands?) of impartial sources - tax records, bills of sales, the IRS, fellow soldiers, neighbors, state and local governments, etc - all people who have no benefit in lying. There can be no rational person who can read the entire book (took me a year) to conclude the "Two Oswalds" theory to be true. Keep up the good work, Mr. Armstrong.

[beaviselectron]

@AlfonsM - Alfons, have you taken the time and trouble to read this 1,000-page book? Yes, it's dry and sometimes tedious. But the facts come from hundreds (thousands?) of impartial sources - tax records, bills of sales, the IRS, fellow soldiers, neighbors, state and local governments, etc - all people who have no benefit in lying. The ere can be no rational person who can read the entire book (took me a year) to conclude the "Two Oswalds" theory to be true.

[pkspalding]

Even if Armstrong is incorrect in fifty per cent of his facts regarding Harvey and Lee, there still is just a wealth of information; at least enough that no one candismiss it out of hand. When it comes to Lee Harvey Oswald, I have learned over the last forty years that nothing, absolutely nothing, is beyond the realm of possibility. There is barely one single fact about the man that is straightforward and uncontested. Armstong should be commended for doing serious reseach

[WlmBrad]

I can't believe anyone would believe the Warren Commission.

There's strong evidence of a Harvey & Lee. People need to read and do research before they comment.

[n0gar]

I have issues with guys who keep smiling while presenting something that most people would views as ridiculous.