Concorde Take Off from La Guardia- X-Plane 9
Uploader Comments (BoeingMan12)
Top Comments
-
sorry to burst the bubble... its JFK cause theres no 13R at LaGuardia and there is one in the vid. and on 13R, water runs along side it the whole way. and 13R is really long (14,000ft) and LaGuardia is only 7,000 and that is clearly visible in the vid. Also, JFK has few trees running on the water side of the runway during warmer season while LaGuardia has no trees along the runway at all. and based on the size, LaGuardia is much smaller and the airport in the vid (JFK)
-
is this REALLY x-plane 9? were you playing it on a C64?
All Comments (34)
-
@travelsonic flight simulator is also certified for training and the physics of an addon aircraft are very good also!
and its also certified for training
-
@finsent0 Hmm, first, lean what a noob is, nublet.
Second, X-plane IS [factually speaking here] BETTER than the MSFS series so far as the physics. Graphically, it could be beter yes, but it is actually - IIRC - certified for use for training by the FAA.
-
@Etti4ever if you find this amazing go play fsx its ten times more amzing noob!
-
How do you get concord??
-
how low did you set the graphics? there wasnt even any anti aliasing
-
HOW DID U GET A CONCORD ON X PLANE 9???
PLEASE REPLAY!
-
concorde FTW!
-
@bartybum - the freeware Concorde could probably be done better, but I wouldn't complain about a freeware model. If you think it could be better, why don't you go into PlaneMaker and fix it? I'll never quite understand why you MSFS guys are always bashing X-Plane. It's like someone with short man syndrome, someone with a confidence problem. If you had no doubts about MSFS, you'd have no reason to even bother criticizing X-Plane.
thanks. sry about the quality
BoeingMan12 3 years ago