9/11 Conspiracy Theories - P.11L Twin Towers Contolled Demo?

theory covered in 9/11 documentary that i forgot to cover in my regular series.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• september
• 11th
• 2001
• terrorists

[revolutionary1982]

911neverforget yes they stand in the windows at the point fire supposed to be red hot and melting the steel.A knife threw bread i dont understand the plane was the weaker of the two structures so how would that be the knife.Look even if it was a plane that cut threw the building like that, say it took out most of the support beams on that floor i still cant see how the whole building would collapse, top 20 floors maybe the rest should still be there every beam didnt fail simultaneously.

[911NeverForget]

no one said the steel melted.

its a analogy dude. just because a building is bigger than a plane doesnt make it invincible FROM a plane.

the top portion did only fall. it simply crashed into the rest due to gravity.

[revolutionary1982]

911neverforget so a)how did the building turn into dust top to bottom if only the impact zone was hot and if it was so hot how do people stand in the windows b)The madrid building is a steel structure,the actual architectural structure may not be the same but steel dont change its melting(weakening) point because of how it was placed in a building.Its still steel ,the plane is debatable still dont know how a mostly aluminium plane goes threw steel n concrete like it wernt ther.

[911NeverForget]

it didnt turn to dust. people stood in the windows because of the smoke. did you not see all the smoke that was visable in the upper floors of the North Tower (for example)? you cant breathe in smoke. so they went to the windows for fresh air.

the towers and the Madrid Building have completely different designs that wasnt limited to steel. apples and oranges. no one said it melted. it didnt melt. weakening =/= melting. different designs mean everything. its a factor behind a collapse.

[911NeverForget]

engineers always look at the design of a building to figure out how it collapsed. if they dont, they wont figure out what went wrong. a building with a steel structure will behave differently than a building with a concrete structure. the way the steel is positioned in the structure matters just as much.

the plane was moving at 500 MPH. its like a knife through bread.

[revolutionary1982]

911never forget what is the point in your series then.You use the worst footage ive ever seen and never prove anything,i just dont understand what the point is. You say the planes weakened the structure,your saying that jet fuel heated the 70 below floors even though there was no fires on these floors.The madrid tower burnt for 24hours whole building engulfed,it still stood.Special again are we get over it 911 was an inside job.

[911NeverForget]

this isnt part of any series i have.

i didnt say the jet fuel heated the 70 floors below the impact zone. just the floors IN the impact zone.

the Madrid Tower A) didnt have the same design as the towers and B) wasnt hit by a large 767 at 500 MPH.

[revolutionary1982]

ninjaslayer anyone who uses RKOWENS as a source is an idiot,ive seen that guys vids there pathetic.The beams wernt cut especially not on a scaffold

[ninjaslayer99]

first off the clean crew used thermite to clean up the wtc they used thermite to cut away the steel of the wreckage to make clean up easier look at RKOwens4 viseo he clearly explains everything

[911NeverForget]

i dont know but since i made the comment its likely that someone bumped into it or so.