讀者拍攝-南亞裔男子襲警被槍殺過程

While the officer was investigating a nuisance complaint, he found a South Asian illegal immigrant suspected to have violent tendencies
警員開槍案中槍男子死亡 (港聞)
2009-03-17 (19:46)
何文田常和街山坡發生警員開槍事件，一名三十歲警員受傷和一名南亞裔男子死亡。

事發約於下午十二時四十分，警方接報指一名男子在紅磡常樂街近馬頭圍抽水站的山邊造成滋擾。警員到場後發現一名年約四十歲的南亞裔男子，於是上前截查，該名男子突然襲擊該­名警員。

在糾纏期間，警員使用警棍及胡椒嘖霧後仍未能制服該男子，同時該男子繼續用木椅襲擊警員，警員最終向該男子開了兩槍，其中一槍打中該男子的頭部。

該警員則手部受傷，兩人被送往伊利沙伯醫院治理。該名南亞裔男子其後於下午六時三十四分證實死亡。該名男子身上並沒有身份証明文件，身份仍有待確定。

案件現正由九龍城警區重案組跟進調查

SINGTAO

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• HKP
• Hong Kong Polce
• suspected
• violent tendencies

[boy45022]

低能 , 話警察唔岩既人係咪傻?

根本果個就係癲佬 , 而且拎住武器添

可能你會話個警察唔講英文/其他文黎叫佢放低武器投降

但你自己諗下啦 , 正常人 , 一個警察拔左槍出黎指住你 , 你會點?

意味住d咩?唔通拔槍黎同你傾計咩

唉 , 香港而家點會變到咁?為反而反 , 真可恥

[raycome20008]

可能有人收電影的影響太大了，以為每個警察都系英雄，臨危不懼

其實警察都系人，系遇到襲擊的情況下一樣會怕

還有不要以為每個警察都系神槍手，系甘既情況下開槍，不會像電影­里面那樣的瀟灑，有時間比你去瞄準，所以誤中頭部系情有可原的

[531MANKIT]

@raycome20008 其實去到嗰一刻,已經唔需要再去講應該射邊度先啱,因為佢首要目­的已經唔係差人捉賊,而係要保護自己嘅生命! 如果佢唔開槍而導致危害自己生命,嗰D三姑六婆又調轉話佢做乜唔­開槍咁笨拾!

[xoxoxotam]

知唔知美國差佬係高速公路點捉犯?

就係開槍打到佢打車行唔到

[sweetsf4life]

做得啱。香港警察太仁慈啦。你睇下美國啲警察啦，開槍跟本諗都唔­使諗，話開就開，拔槍已經係日常嘅事，所以美國嘅市民先會咁聽話­。香港警察應該做事堅決啲，惡啲，市民先識得去驚，識得去尊重警­察。唔好俾自己啲市民嚇翻轉頭。

[sweetsf4life]

@Xplenovo 聽唔明警察講嘢，唔代表可以襲警啩。佢嘅行爲似乎同言語無關。好­似如果喺美國，有啲唔識聽英文嘅人，警察大聲用英文鬧，佢仲襲擊­警員，一樣會被槍擊，分分鐘開得仲快，美國警察開槍跟本諗都唔使­諗，話開就開。香港警察已經算係好仁慈啦。

[sweetsf4life]

警員都係人，佢哋都有權保護自己性命。如果你要批評香港警察，唔­該你先睇下其它國家啲警察執法嘅態度。就算係美國警察，你大聲啲­鬧佢，佢已經會激到開槍打死你啦。有人襲警，警察就有權開槍，有­邊個國家唔係咁樣？一個成功嘅社會，係需要有power嘅警力。­如果政府控制唔到市民，邊個去維持秩序呀？喺香港做警察真係辛苦­，做得幾好，啲市民都係唔識尊重。有事嗰陣就去叫救命搵警察，冇­事嗰陣就喺度投訴。The police force in any government is there to control and maintain a peace society, assaulting an officer is a serious crime in any country, the officer has all the right to discharge his/her firearm to stop the assault. A powerful police force is important for a successful region. Stop complaining.

[Xplenovo]

 其實個巴"機'斯坦人係咪聽唔明個阿蛇個咩呢. . .

.__.?

[sls18722]

@Sosogang 4. as the man kept approaching to the officer, with a "weapon" (just forget whether it is fatal or not at this stage of discussion), how do you define "forceing"? put like this, someone holds a broken chair and aproaches to you

5. why say so? I dun see any reports (official or not) say that officer shot the man at the back?

6. Justice prevailed!

7. Yet, we, all the people, including the officer, do not want this happen again, we feel sorry and sad to the man

[sls18722]

@Sosogang 1. The "safe distance" was shorterning, as the man move forward to the officer

2. how do you define "fatel weapon"? Unless you have practised the Chinese martial art, like "Iron Head" or "Chi Kung", I believe in most of cases you would definitely be dead/ seriously injury after knocked by that broken chair.

3. keep moving around is a correct movement, because he wanted to stay a "safe distance" away from the man...it also reinforces point no.1 that the man kept approaching to him

[KitaroED]

well,, cant blame the police.

he did what he gotta do.

[Sosogang]

1. the policeman was in a safe distant from the "culprit"

2. the "culprit" had not got any fatal weapon in his hand at all

3. look at the policeman himself: he kept on moving around+around; this showed that he was in an unstable state of mind

4. he himself kep on crying out "Don't force me ! Don't force me !" while actually no one was forcing him !!

5. eventually he shot at the back of the "culprit" while the "culprit"' was with his back facing the policeman ! 6. may Justice prevail