일본 교과서 독도는 일본땅 명기 반대

전세계의 반대에도 불구하고 일본은 08.7.14 중학교 교과서 해설서에 "독도는 일본땅"이라고 표기하기로 결정했다.
Regardless of the world's opposition, Japan decided on July 14, 2008 to state that "Dokdo is Japanese territory" in its high school and middle school textbook manual.

그러나 우리는 믿는다.
However, we have faith.

아무리 일본정부가 역사적 진리를 왜곡하려 하더라도
No matter how the Japanese government distort historical truth,

일본의 순수한 중고교 학생들은 그것이 일본정부의 의도된 거짓말이며 과거 2천년동안 그리고 앞으로도 항상 독도는 한국땅인 것을 인정할 것이다
Japan's middle school and high school students will recognize that such allegations are intentional lies of the Japanese government, and will admit that Dokdo has always been for the past two thousand years and will always be South Korea's territory.

왜냐하면 지동설을 믿은 갈릴레오도 그랬기 때문이다
Just like Galileo believed in the Copernican theory,

진리는 강요한다고 바꿔질 수 있는 것은 아니다
Truth cannot be changed by force.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 일본
• 교과서
• 왜곡
• 독도
• 다케시마

[GCinKorea]

역사교육을 제대로 못받은 일본 쪽발이년.

[ben08820]

역사를 왜곡하는 민족에겐 미래가없다

[wolfpack13000]

※It is meaningless even if I insist though there are not logical grounds.

Try to prove a claim.

A lot of evidence of the territory of Japan has Takeshima.

Takeshima is a territory of Japan.

※論理的な根拠が無いのに主張しても無意味だ｡主張を証明してみ­ろ｡

竹島は日本領土の証拠は沢山、有る｡竹島は日本領土だ｡

[wolfpack13000]

>FrontalViolator

Where is your claim written on?(dokdo)

『三国史記』巻第四 新羅本紀 智證麻立干紀

十三年夏六月　于山国帰服　歳以土宜為貢　于山国在溟州正東海島　或名欝陵島　地方一百里　恃嶮不服　伊口異斯夫　為何瑟羅州軍主　謂于山人愚悍　難以威来　可以討服　乃多造木偶師子　分載戦船　抵其国海岸　誑告曰　汝若不服 則放此猛獣踏殺之　国人恐懼則降

(1145年に編纂された朝鮮半島最古の文献史料『三国史記』)

[wolfpack13000]

※It is meaningless even if I insist though there are not logical grounds.

Try to prove a claim.

A lot of evidence of the territory of Japan has Takeshima.

Takeshima is a territory of Japan.

※論理的な根拠が無いのに主張しても無意味だ｡主張を証明してみ­ろ｡

竹島は日本領土の証拠は沢山有る｡竹島は日本領土だ｡

[wolfpack13000]

>FrontalViolator

Where is your claim written on?(written on dokdo？)

『三国史記』巻第四 新羅本紀 智證麻立干紀

十三年夏六月　于山国帰服　歳以土宜為貢　于山国在溟州正東海島　或名欝陵島　地方一百里　恃嶮不服　伊口異斯夫　為何瑟羅州軍主　謂于山人愚悍　難以威来　可以討服　乃多造木偶師子　分載戦船　抵其国海岸　誑告曰　汝若不服 則放此猛獣踏殺之　国人恐懼則降

[wolfpack13000]

>FrontalViolator

There are many results and records that I use Takeshima (former name, Matsushima) in Japan and influenced.

I crossed the sea in a policy, and Korea prohibited it. Takeshima does not have a trace and the use record that I am active and used either.

※ There are not a trace and the grounds of the practice rule of Takeshima by Korea historically.

You are lacking in study.

[FrontalViolator]

@wolfpack13000 we have plenty of evidence that Dokdo is Korean. look up 'why is dokdo korean?' on google

[wolfpack13000]

大韓地誌 geographical book,

A geography book arranged in Korea of the Korea empire in 1899.

I write down the domain of the large Korea empire from 42°15'N, 124°35'E to 130°35'E from 33°15'N.

The position of Takeshima does not enter the domain of the large Korea empire at 37°14'N, 131°52'E. It is listed in the 大韓地誌 geographical book with the→sea of Japan.