@pacmanlegend every one in the professional cinema world can tell the difference. the only people that can't tell the difference are cock knockers like yourself who think cinema camera's are worth $20,000.
try $250,000.
now go watch your faggot crank movie and jerk off to the niggers.
@Bluestarcinema ok that's fine lol. but the point is ....most people cant tell the difference.... cameras like these are good enough for what people are trying to do. just because u have a sick gay fetish for some 20 thousand dollar camera don't try to ruin it for other people. by the way...crank was actually shot on the cheap less than 1000 dollar cameras lol. later fag boy
@Bluestarcinema dude...crank 2 was shot on a digital camera....who knows wtf ur talking about. U thinking to much into what a film should look like. some people see things like this as perfect. if u like film so damn much u fuckin prick why are u looking at videos like this for....now think about that!
@Bluestarcinema Yeah no shit asshole, but we all don't have a few grand to spend on film, processing, etc. There are many "real" movies shot digital and many people make a pleasing look on dv and hdv. If you don't like it then watch something else and go eat ten dicks.
@Bluestarcinema 21 megapixel u mean lol.
AllThingsKen 2 months ago
@pacmanlegend every one in the professional cinema world can tell the difference. the only people that can't tell the difference are cock knockers like yourself who think cinema camera's are worth $20,000.
try $250,000.
now go watch your faggot crank movie and jerk off to the niggers.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema ok that's fine lol. but the point is ....most people cant tell the difference.... cameras like these are good enough for what people are trying to do. just because u have a sick gay fetish for some 20 thousand dollar camera don't try to ruin it for other people. by the way...crank was actually shot on the cheap less than 1000 dollar cameras lol. later fag boy
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@pacmanlegend crank 2 is a joke, crank 2 has nothing on the dark knight and inception (both shot in 65mm)
nice QQ faggot.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema dude...crank 2 was shot on a digital camera....who knows wtf ur talking about. U thinking to much into what a film should look like. some people see things like this as perfect. if u like film so damn much u fuckin prick why are u looking at videos like this for....now think about that!
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@pacmanlegend no You are wrong.
Digital doesn't include film grain, film texture, regulation movement, dust, unique color pallet, and 14 stops of exposure lattitude.
and most importantly 18 mega pixels worth of resolution per frame (35mm) and 110 mega pixels per frame (70mm IMAX)
make sure you know what your talking about before you talk out of your ass.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema are u serious? lol this is 100% purely wrong. U need good color correcters....24p....
pacmanlegend 1 year ago
@Bluestarcinema Yeah no shit asshole, but we all don't have a few grand to spend on film, processing, etc. There are many "real" movies shot digital and many people make a pleasing look on dv and hdv. If you don't like it then watch something else and go eat ten dicks.
minarovich 1 year ago
Nice. I liked it. Specially the girl xD
ElPandaDeLaAccion 1 year ago
this doesnt look look film, it looks like home DV.
to get the look of film you have to shoot with film, and thats just the bottom line.
Bluestarcinema 1 year ago