Moon Myth BUSTED! Moon Laser!

Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays Everyone!

The question is not, is it fantasy or not. The question is, could they keep their faking it secret? If so, which would have been easier, landing on the moon, or keeping every single person involved in any space mission over the last 40 years quiet?

That's what I thought.

all they gotta do is send a probe to the moon to leave all that man made shit over there

@DANYHWH
If they could send a probe, or actually 6, why didn't they send people? Conspiracy theorists often claim radiation, but Cosmos 110 spent 22 DAYS going in and out of the Van Allen belts with two dogs aboard. Far longer exposure then Apollo, yet the dose was 12 rads.
Or the photos from the lunar flyby Zond probes, which would have been fogged if radiation was as extreme as claimed by CT. They weren't.
If they had the hardware, as Skylab showed, why didn't they go?

The question is not, is it fantasy or not. The question is, could they have faked it? If so, which would have been easier, faking it or actually landing the astronauts on the moon? Then ask yourself, which path does government usually take, the easy or the hard?

i ment who filmed the lander

Do you mean the lunar module leaving the lunar surface? There is only two sources One, there was 16mm film cameras inside the LM's. Two, on the last three missions, there was a camera on the rover, that could be panned, zoomed, and tilted from Mission Control. On Apollo 15, the servos for tilting it broke, so they couldn't film the ascent once it left the feild of view. On Apollo 16, they timed it wrong because the rover was too close. But on Apollo 17, after much practise, they got it right.

thanx now i know!

And knowing is half the battle!. ;-)
Glad to be of service, live long and prosper.

ummmm we are making a hotel up there now.....