American Blood

what about during the clinton administration? The Attacks on Waco Texas and Ruby Ridge in Idaho? Wouldn't that be considered traitorous by attacking American civilians? I do agree with you on the Lincoln thing, but to say that were completely in the wrong? I would have to disagree with there. I would recommend the book 'Lone Survivor' by Marcus Lutrell. He was a Navy seal who was the only survivor of a Seal Team in North Eastern afganastan, and he explains because he had a better idea of it

Yes, it would be traitorous...,actually Fascist to attack your own people. By saying you don't think "we" are completely in the wrong, who is "we"? If you mean the Bush Administration then I ask 'why not'? Who else could be held responsible for his irresponsibility? And I'm familiar with Lutrell, but I'll have to say that neither Lutrell, nor the Seals, nor the U.S. should have even been in Afghanistan to begin with, and his "idea" doesn't "explain" anything. He was a tool for invaders.

I guess now he is fighting for Obama eh acorn?

Believing what a hippy has to say (19Truth53) would be like taking Algore at his word.

Are you kidding me. These guys are as far away from hippy as you can get. Try my hero Willie Nelson, now he is an old hippy.

I dont even know who you are responding to!

DarogaDaae

If nothing else, this song has people thinking and defending their thoughts, rather than believing what any one side or person tells them to believe.

Keep it up, boys. RK ROCKS!!!!

And yet, Kerry, Clinton and now Obama support all of it. Ron Paul is the only answer!

Actually he had no duty to "preserve the union". His duty was "to uphold the constitution". The "union" was a voluntary organization of states that some chose to leave. They were forced back by the US Army at the cannon's mouth. 600,000 dead because of it.