9/11 - WTC 1 - North Tower - Venting, Not CT squibs!!!

Squibs created by explosive charges happen rapidly as they are a singular effect and are seen when blasting concrete collumns or other material. These are not the same, they increase in intensity as the collapsing pile approaches. Notice the vent on the right, a second vent quickly appears one floor below it and they are the same color as the smoke, not steel nor the siding material being blasted nor the dust as seen in the collapse.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 9/11
• WTC1
• North
• Tower
• Squibs

[ArcanineKing]

Many WTC engineers explained that this building is airtight in case of a fire, and that's not dust coming out of it. Many said the WTC's core would handle multiple impacts of 737s (since the 767s are smaller than those), and it'd still remain upright. Just like that time a large bomber struck the Empire State back in the 1930s. It's still standing after a long fire, isn't it?

All of this is illogical. It defies more than one law of physics and reality is not present here. This was controlled.

[coffeenuts44]

Airtight as in the big 140 foot hole in the side of the building or as in airtight as we clearly see a jet of fire come out the right side at collapse. Ever see E=1/2 mv^2 before? 200mph=90m/s 500mph=224m/s Now V^2 for both is 8100 at 200mph and 50200 at 500mph. Over SIX times the energy of their estimate for an airliner impact just in velocity. Now mass? another three to four times factor? Were already in the range of 18 to 24 times the energy. Go back to school moron.

[Sandberg1972]

OK, we'll give the ball to u then:

Can u prove that these "fires" burned in such a way that they caused the steel columns to ALL heat up at about the same speed (which by the way must be HUGE to heat up steel columns like they used in the WTC to over 500 or 600 Celsius), and ALL gave way at about the same moment?

Also, do u know what happens if just a few beams would be intact when most of the rest would fail (a highly UNlikely scenario)?

I mean, think again, do u know what the ODDS are?

[coffeenuts44]

And whats your obsession with "ALL" collumns having to be heated and "ALL" collumns having to fail due to damage and fire? If I supported ten pounds over ten sand columns that would each support exactly 1 pound and then knocked one out what do you think happens? 9 of the 10 are perfect. What if I knocked the center one down with the other 9 around the perimeter? Which of the nine fails first and what determines it? Do you get it or are you done yet?

[coffeenuts44]

Stop with the bullshit and get a brain. Whats your point anyway? Every video shows the "squibs", which they are not, increase in velocity as the collapse approaches. Thats not possible with explosives. The outer collums were steel. How do you get an 80ft blast "squib" from steel collumns directed outward? You can't and you would have heard the blast over the rumble of the collapse. Ok so it came from the core, 35~60ft inside? How did it manage to exit a single window or vent port? Drrr!

[ArcanineKing]

The floors weren't the only thing that were airtight, the elevator shafts were pretty much airtight as well. As for the 'venting', there were squibs up to 50 floors down. How did "air pressure" get past two service floors, let alone, two large airtight elevator shafts to vent the windows at an incredibly fast rate of less of 2 seconds? There is a video that shows a squib emanating from way below during the collapse.

Also, read WTC's "Drive to the Top" elevator shaft renovation plan.

[akhenatten]

The buildings DID withstand the impacts and remained standing. The amount of fuel carried on a cross-country aircraft is what brought the buildings down and not the impacts. The floors WERE airtight, the air and dust had nowhere to go but out the windows which it did.

A controlled implosion takes months of work including gutting out the entire building, drilling thousands of holes for explosives and even removing major load bearing structures pre-blast. This was not controlled or planned for.

[uyoudecide]

who cares jones found unexploded nanothermite its about to be peer reviewed independent labs have samples of the dust

The Truth Will prevail!

[coffeenuts44]

Apparently you patently ignore the structural egineers as well. And yes I have an engineering degree by the way.

[Sandberg1972]

And u don't have ANY evidence either of the damage inside those towers.

Look my friend, if u know anything about the application of laws of physics in the real world, u would or should be able to spot the impossibilities of the official explanation fairly easily.

U don't have to know a lot about engineering, u claim u have to, but that's bullshit, it's a very CHEAP way to make people shut up. Nobody knows shit except for the structural engineers, right?

Go suck on it.