@raponte1955 If God does not need to be created since He is outside time, then as the Universe when a singularity was also outside time (as the time dimesnsion unfolded at the moment of the Big Bang), according to Your logic (not mine) there was no Creation as the matter of the Universe has also always existed. Please show how this reasoning is faulty as opposed to merely declaring it so.
@geniusrepairman1 Typical case of " non-sequitur". Your reasoning is faulty and a fallacy. I think you should stop taking sleeping pills, since it may be somehow deteriorating your neurones, as per your horrendous attempt to reasoning.
@raponte1955 Then that might explain where the Singularity that started the Big Bang came from. Time began with the Bang so therefore using your logic that means that all the matter of the Universe has always existed as it is outside time. So God is not required as there was no need for Him to create anything!
@raponte1955 If this is true, what makes you think God is YOUR God? God might look like the Hexetorian 8 Frog People of Galaxy 3.56668 that She created in Her image and even now the Hexetorians have regular meetings with God on how to spread their Watery Paradise to other worthy civilisations within their local star cluster.
@SonofJaphet All Europeans were racist in those days. Even HG Wells the great Humanist writer and intellectual 50 years later had some racist views. They believed that the greater the civilisation (based on their own standard) the greater the intellectual bearing of the race. But there is evidence Darwin showed compassion to indiginous populations he met on his travels.
@SonofJaphet Thomas Malthus was basically an economist and knew nothing of Natural History or Natural Selection. It was Darwin who realised that the argument of "survival of the fittest" was a form of Natural Selection that explained how evolution works. About 20 years later Alfred Wallace independently worked out pretty much the same thing and unfortunately Darwin had not completed his book on the subject. So both men got equal credit but the book made Darwin famous later.
@raponte1955 It is. Once life begins then evolution takes over wherever the life is in the Universe. BUT EVOLUTION DOES NOT BEGIN LIFE.
geniusrepairman1 16 hours ago
@raponte1955 If God does not need to be created since He is outside time, then as the Universe when a singularity was also outside time (as the time dimesnsion unfolded at the moment of the Big Bang), according to Your logic (not mine) there was no Creation as the matter of the Universe has also always existed. Please show how this reasoning is faulty as opposed to merely declaring it so.
geniusrepairman1 17 hours ago
@geniusrepairman1 Typical case of " non-sequitur". Your reasoning is faulty and a fallacy. I think you should stop taking sleeping pills, since it may be somehow deteriorating your neurones, as per your horrendous attempt to reasoning.
raponte1955 1 day ago
@raponte1955 Then that might explain where the Singularity that started the Big Bang came from. Time began with the Bang so therefore using your logic that means that all the matter of the Universe has always existed as it is outside time. So God is not required as there was no need for Him to create anything!
geniusrepairman1 1 day ago
@raponte1955 If this is true, what makes you think God is YOUR God? God might look like the Hexetorian 8 Frog People of Galaxy 3.56668 that She created in Her image and even now the Hexetorians have regular meetings with God on how to spread their Watery Paradise to other worthy civilisations within their local star cluster.
geniusrepairman1 1 day ago
@SonofJaphet All Europeans were racist in those days. Even HG Wells the great Humanist writer and intellectual 50 years later had some racist views. They believed that the greater the civilisation (based on their own standard) the greater the intellectual bearing of the race. But there is evidence Darwin showed compassion to indiginous populations he met on his travels.
geniusrepairman1 1 day ago
@SonofJaphet Thomas Malthus was basically an economist and knew nothing of Natural History or Natural Selection. It was Darwin who realised that the argument of "survival of the fittest" was a form of Natural Selection that explained how evolution works. About 20 years later Alfred Wallace independently worked out pretty much the same thing and unfortunately Darwin had not completed his book on the subject. So both men got equal credit but the book made Darwin famous later.
geniusrepairman1 1 day ago
Mary is upset with creationists for lying about her work. The did not find red blood cells. Read her paper before you accept the lies in this video.
gregrutz 6 days ago
@SonofJaphet Let me guess, you watched 'Expelled' LOL and believed it.
gregrutz 6 days ago
@SonofJaphet Tell me why creationists always say 'based on assumptions'' and never list them?
gregrutz 6 days ago