DYING DOG AS ART?!?! Hipocrite to make a point

Tammy Dingo


if he has done it once whats the point of doing it again, REALY ? weather its true or not.


Guillermo Vargas

El fin NO justifica los medios/

Starvation is not a art, starvation is suffering and thats all it is.
starvation is suffering and is not an art.
you can paint pain but not make pain!
You Have Perverted art!

were do you draw the limit this up coming artist are trying to be original by producing outrageous works to get noticed.
and who are the fouls for liking them and taking them seriously?.
......................
You are what you read
You are what you be be leave
You are what you do


Despues de buscar en internet se puede llegar a varias conclusiones con respeto a lo que Guillermo queria expresar. la frase de: "eres lo que lees" quizas pretende decir que no debemos creer todo lo que leemos, quizas Guillermo pretendia crear toda esta polemica o farsa para hacer reflexionar a la gente que no debemos creer todo lo que lemos.

De todos modos, no puede justificar su mesaje, su finalidad, mediante el sufrimiento de un animal.




Donde esta el arte?

No se puede jugar a ser Dios.

his inspiration was just, but his message was not!be weakening the dog he killed the dog. The dogs life was in his hands. The moment that dog came of the streets into a gallery! If Guillermo saved the dog, kept it fed it then yeah this man would have got my respect.

But he didn't, please if this story is correct sign the survey to stop this man repeating this show!

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• guillermo
• vargas
• artes
• visuales
• interpretativas
• rita
• ruggeri
• artist
• Visual
• Arts
• Humanities

[sarsah82]

exactly, if anyone actually did any research on this. the guy did this to raise awareness. to raise a point. im not saying its right. but dogs like this starve and die everyday in 3rd world countries. unfourtunatly, this dog would have died either way. he wanted people to see it, to make a change. sometimes art is more then "a pretty picture" look at how much awarness this has gotten. maybe people will try to help the situation instead of just walking by. :)

[rimind1]

@sarsah82 thanks for your intelligent comment. love that song by david. had a peck at your profile. tc

[sexywheats]

he didnt kill a dog. he caught a starving dog on the street, fed it, and tied it up for 3 hours. it didn't die, at least not while he had it. everyone freaked out when rumors leaked that he had killed a dog in the name of "art", which if he had, would have been terrible. but it DIDN'T happen. now everyone is condemning him to death and torture, just proving his point. people who know nothing about it are arguing what is "art" and what's not, and marking any comment against theirs as spam.

[rimind1]

thats great news if thats the case, but to be honest i dont know what the truth is.. his work has confussed me, but thats a good thing keep the novety alive. like i said be 4r he is a good conceptual artist, and yes i do get the concept of it , you r what you read. beleave what you read, so we become what we read. thanks for commenting has shead a new light for me.

[FreeFormFarm]

RELAX PEOPLE , HE DiD NOT ABUSE THE DOG !....

After all the outrage, the Humane Society of the United States, made an investigation AND concluded that the dog was in a state of starvation when it was captured was only tied up for three hours on one day before it escaped after one day of captivity..★...While the petition "against him" has over 4million signatures, Guillermo Vargas has endorsed the petition, saying that he too, has signed it.... oh, and it was a one time thing...get real info!

[middy444]

@sexywheats what he done was still wrong, even if the dog did not die.

[Ultimist]

@sarsah82 People like you should be murdered mercilessly in front of your entire family. And I'm dead serious. You are a vile, stinking pile of worthless gutter trash, and I hope you die. You CANNOT justify pain and suffering by saying it was to "raise awareness"... Rather than starve a dog, he could have easily shown an exhibit of dogs who were already starving. You're pathetic... anyone who tries to justify such a thing is NOT HUMAN. You're disgusting... and i hope you suffer.

[Ultimist]

@sarsah82 You're a fucking sick asshole. There are plenty of real word tragedies he could have used to "raise awareness" Do we abuse more children to raise awareness about child abuse? Do we rape more women to raise awareness about rape? Your feeble attempt to justify this SICK person means that you are JUST AS SICK, a pathetic excuse for a human being. The dog wouldn't have "died either way" you heartless piece of trash... He had the dog and so he could have FED IT.

[TerrorKruemeL1401]

i understand his message to the humanity...but the way he have told us was terribly wrong.

it's a mistake i can't forgive him for myself..because every existence have the right of living,if they are animals or human or trees.

it's my own oppinion to this thing.

but i realy understand his message...because no one of the visitors help this poor dog..they are the same like the artist himself..

[MrTheNewBEN]

What the fuck. fucking asshole needs to die.

[ImSiCJim]

I wish all of you be open minded persons and stop support him, he made a big mistake. And what did he gain, if that was an art with message? What? People from costa rica and all over the world stoped doing that kind of torture to animals? No they didn't stop, 'cause they're not even human beings, they don't even have a soul, they're monsters!

[ImSiCJim]

I have a question! If I'll take a human being and put it in a gallery, then I'll take a big knife and cut his head off infront of other ppl, that makes me an artist? It's not a joke I'm just curious. All I want is from ppl to see the way, how poor interviewers, american soldiers and Iraq people die by the hand of Iraq tettorists. So please stop all that bullshit about art. Only God can take your life not a bloody junkie who calls himself an artist by removing a poor dog's life.

[Olimpia963]

@Zombiefae Somehow my answer to you disappeared. Anyway, I think we got sidetracked here, and as much as I would like to continue our conversation I don't want to spam this comment area..so if you don't mind we could message each other further on?