Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Convexity adjustment for Eurodollar futures

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,219
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 3, 2008

A key difference between a futures contract and a forward contract is daily settlement: the instrument is daily marked-to-market. If the value of the futures increases, this creates excess margin cash; if value declines, there will be a margin call (when the maintenance level is reached). Therefore, a Eurodollar futures contract has more volatility than a similar forward rate agreement (FRA). This implies a slightly higher rate.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (bionicturtledotcom)

  • Isn't any continuously compounded rate lower than any other time frequency compounded rate?

    Then because 90/360 =1/4, a quarterly compounded rate R means

    (1+R/4)^4 = 1 + Q where Q is the annually compounded rate.

    Similarly, if r is the continuously compounded rate, by definition

    exp ( r * 1) =1 + Q.

    In other words, (1+ R/4) ^ 4 = exp (r*1) or r = ln [ ( 1+ R/4)^4 ] = 4 * ln ( 1+R/4).

    Numerically r = 4 * ln ( 1 + 6% /4 ) = 4 * ln ( 1+0.015) = 5.9554%

  • @McQuack1 Yes, you are exactly correct.

    Apologies that i did not hover longer on the fact that the formula used is LN(1+6%/4)*365/90. You will notice the multiplier (365/90) is performing DAY COUNT conversion (ie, in addition to the frequency conversion) from actual/360 (money market) to ACT/365 (bond). I followed Hull's example here. So two factors (although the final is correct!).

    But your rule is good and useful for checking cals, of course: r[continuous] < r[discrete]. thanks!

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JohnBocca01 its a treasury bond. u hav to take day count convention as actual/actual. so the calcu is LN(1.015)=0.014888612 ; 1.489*365/90= 6.04.

  • Dfuts are Act/360

    “Tailing" due to margining is NOT FRA convexity. FRA cvx exists without margining. It’s due to different conventions. Futures = "discount yield"

    F=100–f

    FRA's rely on simple interest

    F*~1/(1+f*T)

    Fut = linear price/yield relationship. FRA's = non-linear (i.e. "convexity" in p/y).

    Margining issues need, at least, 2 rates (e.g. O/N, & term), correlation, and margins.

    BTW, FRA's (anything) can be margined.

    see arbitrage-trading. com/TG2_BSandIR_Vol1. htm

  • Nice presentation but the conversion of the quarterly compounded interest rate into an equivalent continuously compounded rate is wrong. The correct rate is not 6.04% but 5.9554%. The formula is 4 * ln(1+R/4), where R is the quarterly compounded rate (6%).

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more