Self Flagellation(Zanjeer Zani) is not allowed in Shia Islam- Syed Ammar Nakshwani

Zanjeer Zani, Qama Zani are not part of Shia Islam.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ammar
• Nakshwani
• syed
• shia
• sunni
• muharram
• ashura
• matam
• zanjeer
• zani
• qadri
• urdu
• kafir
• wahabi
• iraq
• iran
• pakistan
• imam
• hussain

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida Once again, it is simple to understand that verse 33:33 means removing all sins from the house because they will reflect the perfection of Allah (swt) and the Quran by guiding (Allah's) creations towards the religion of Islam. If anyone associates themselves with sins, how will they be capable of leading with credibility? This is why you will never find any impurities associated with the Ahlulbayt (pbut). They are a reflection of Allah (swt), so do not disrespect them.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida "Imam-e-zamana" literally means "IMAM OF OUR TIME". Allah (swt) states in the quran: "One day, we shall call every people with their Imam." (17:71)

The quran is not just a book about the past, but serves as a guide for all time. In this verse, Allah (swt) clearly claims that he will call all people with their Imam (guide). When you associate such vile, disrespectful and disgusting comments with our Imam, you contradict Allah's (swt) command.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida once again, "And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83)

When you say anything about shias, you are insulting our Prophets (pbut). This just shows your level of ignorance.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida you're a wahabi troll.

33:33 states "o people of the house....", so it cannot mean "books". Also, in the verses before this, it clearly states that those cohorts (wives) who commit sin will be punished double. I referenced countless sunni sources (ex: sahih) to prove that the evidence is unbiased against aisha (la) and hafsa (la).

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida Again, there are numerous citations that are credible in source/narrations from both sects that prove the Ahlulbayt to be free of impurities. I've posted most of them here, but its obvious that you do not read them. Besides that, its quite obvious that you're main purpose is to hide the truth, hence why you spam this video with the same baseless accusations just so the proof will be pushed to another page. I'm sure @urduwale will notice this and delete your spam.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida that "proof" did not prove your point. You clearly cannot interpret the english language, or else you would realize that the tone of that specific reference does not question the purity of any member of the Ahlulbayt (pbut). Furthermore, it contradicts your own purpose. Anyone who is not possessed with hatred (for which is clouding your judgment) will agree with me.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida Sahih Muslim, Chapter of virtues of companions, section of the virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet (PBUH&HF), 1980 Edition Pub. in Saudi Arabia, Arabic version, v4, p1883, Tradition #61.

Aisha (la) herself narrates that the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) clearly identifies the verse 33:33 to be only for him, Bibi Fatima (sa), Maula Ali (as), Maula Hassan (as) & Maula Hussain (as).

This is a fact, and you can google search it within seconds to confirm.

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida In Sahih Muslim, there is a chapter named "Chapter of Virtues of the Companions". Inside this chapter, there is a section called "Section of the Virtues of the Ahlul-Bayt of the Prophet". There exists ONLY ONE tradition in this section, and this tradition has no reference to the wives of the Prophet (PBUH&HF). The tradition is known as "The Tradition of Cloak/Mantle" (Hadith al-Kisaa)

[akmnawab110]

@12hamida collectively, you've only posted up six "references"...I refuted all six with credible evidence. Two of them were lies and had nothing to do with the sermons found in Nahjul Balagah, and the other four were beyond weak in its credibility due to the narrators.

[akmnawab110]

@urduwale The deen is being questioned, and I have been answering with legitimate and credible proof. He's been spreading hate, and it is our jobs as Muslims to defend the religion from any impurities or attacks. I kindly request you to just let the debate go on for another week and then delete all the unnecessary comments he has posted because he has no validity (sources, references, etc) in them. Let the world see how wahabis just talk without any credibility.