States Can Nullify Unconstitutional Federal Laws

Recently, Andrew Napolitano sat in as a guest host on the Glenn Beck show. He interviewed both Kevin Gutzman and Thomas E. Woods, who are two of the countrys leading minds on state sovereignty issues. Powerful stuff.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• states-rights
• state-sovereignty
• nullification
• tom-woods
• andrew-napolitano
• kevin-gutzman
• constitution

[7255202]

@darkblood626 This comment is awesome! im gonna have to copy and paste it somewhere it fits.

[7255202]

@mozartgenetics How else would he have any impact? How else would he be able to get his points out there? This guy is the only talking head i agree with more than 90% of the time.

[mozartgenetics]

I would love to think Mr. Napolatano is on our side but he works for a globalist network. That doesn't feel right to me. 

[darkblood626]

When government grants power to itself you have tyranny.

When government power is limited to the power of an individual then there is liberty.

All government power originate from an extension of an individual’s right that’s why police use firearms to defend you because you can use fire arms to defend yourself if an individual cannot murder a free government cannot either. If you cannot do X nether can you’re government in a free country.

[MopDMTBARTL]

Vatican-Pope-Jesuits-illuminat­i-NAZIS-CFR (luciferian jews) run the world. All secret societies, organized religions ruled by an elite bloodline, same bloodline ruling from Egypt 2 Rome British (European) Empire - America Empire (1913 Fed Reserve. Presidents & King stand at whim of the real power which is the priest hood (Priests - Bishops - Cardinals - Pope) standing behind the throne - trying to form it's one world luciferian gov't.

truthknowledge. Com

truthknowledge. com/The_System. php

[seanrsk]

this needs to go viral does any one know how to get this message out there?

[breakinthebend]

@RazielKain Nothing? Oh ok.

[breakinthebend]

@RazielKain The replies are becoming excessive, mostly my fault because I want to provide thorough responses, but if you want to continue, send a private message.

[breakinthebend]

@RazielKain The real question is whether infrastructure in smaller areas could only be provided by governments. If not, does the government provide the infrastructure better, and more efficiently than the market. No, the government is not the only one capable of providing an infrastructure and no, it doesn't provide an infrastructure more efficiently than the market would. There exist many sectors of the U.S. economy that compete with, and outperform the government.

[breakinthebend]

@RazielKain

National governments are necessary, but they should only exist to fulfill the roles in which are rightly allocated to them.

Infrastructure is often legitimized by national governments as they are required in aiding the government with national defense (a national government responsibility). A nation with poor infrastructure will be less able to defend itself from invasion than one that has a well-built infrastructure.

That's a straw man argument anyway.